Accessibility navigation


The National Audit Office uses OR to assess the value for money of public services

Bechberger, E., Lane, D. C. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6658-7041, McBride, T., Morton, A., Quintas, D. and Wong, C. H. (2011) The National Audit Office uses OR to assess the value for money of public services. Interfaces: An International Journal of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences, 41 (4). pp. 365-374. ISSN 0092-2102

Full text not archived in this repository.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1287/inte.1110.0551

Abstract/Summary

Supreme audit institutions (SAIs) have an important role in assessing value for money in the delivery of public services. Assessing value for money necessarily involves assessing counterfactuals: good value for money has been achieved if a policy could not reasonably have been delivered more efficiently, effectively, or economically. Operations research modelling has the potential to help in the assessment of these counterfactuals. However, is such modelling too arcane, complex, and technically burdensome for organisations that, like SAIs, operate in a time- and resource-constrained and politically charged environment? We report on three applications of modelling at the UK's SAI, the National Audit Office, in the context of studies on demand management in tax collection, end-of-life care, and health-care associated infections. In all cases, the models have featured in the audit reports and helped study teams come to a value-for-money judgment. We conclude that OR modelling is indeed a valuable addition to the value-for-money auditor's methodological tool box.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Henley Business School > Business Informatics, Systems and Accounting
ID Code:29746
Uncontrolled Keywords:accounting; hospitals; health care; services; government agencies; tax policy
Publisher:INFORMS

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation