Accessibility navigation

‘Victory in a Nuclear War? A Comparison of NATO and WTO War Aims and Strategies’

Heuser, B. (1998) ‘Victory in a Nuclear War? A Comparison of NATO and WTO War Aims and Strategies’. Contemporary European History , 7 (3). pp. 311-328.

Full text not archived in this repository.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.


Given the danger of the unbearable catastrophe of nuclear war, NATO in the mid-1950s abandoned any war aim of achieving victory in an all-out war with the Soviet Union or the Warsaw Treaty Organisation. Instead, it adopted the war aim of a cease-fire or war termination. By contrast, the WTO clung on to the war aim of victory - expressed even in terms of the survival of slightly more Soviet citizens than NATO citizens, after unprecedented losses of life in nuclear exchanges - until the mid-1980s when under Gorbachev the concept of victory in nuclear war was abandoned.

Item Type:Article
Divisions:Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Politics, Economics and International Relations > Politics and International Relations
ID Code:30457

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation