Human monstrosity: rape, ambiguity and performance in Rosemary’s Baby (Roman Polanski, 1968)Fife, L. (2008) Human monstrosity: rape, ambiguity and performance in Rosemary’s Baby (Roman Polanski, 1968). In: Baumgartner, H. and Davis, R. (eds.) Hosting the Monster. At the Interface/Probing the Boundaries (52). Rodopi, Amsterdam / New York, pp. 43-62. ISBN 9042024860 Full text not archived in this repository. It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing. Official URL: http://www.rodopi.nl/senj.asp?BookId=ati/ptb+52 Abstract/SummaryThe narrative of Rosemary’s Baby hinges on a central hesitation between pregnancy induced madness and the existence of Satanism. Accordingly, the monstrous element is embodied in both the real and the supernatural: Rosemary’s husband Guy (John Cassavetes) is responsible for her victimisation through rape in either explanation. However, I will argue that the inherent ambiguity of the plot makes it difficult to place him as such a figure typical to the archetypal horror binaries of normality/monster, human/inhuman. By displacing generic convention the film complicates the issue of monstrosity, whilst simultaneously offering the possibility for the depiction of female experience of marriage to be at the centre of the narrative, for the real to be possibly of more significance than the supernatural. Previous writing has tended to concentrate on Rosemary and her pregnancy, so through detailed consideration of Cassavetes’ performance and its placement in the mise-en-scène this focus on Guy aims to demonstrate that he changes almost as much as Rosemary does. The chapter will focus on the film’s depiction of rape, during Rosemary’s nightmare and after it, in order to demonstrate how the notion of performance reveals Guy’s monstrousness and the difficulties this represents in our engagement with him.
Altmetric Deposit Details University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record |