Accessibility navigation

Reinterpreting ‘generic structure’: evolution, application and limitations of a concept

Lane, D. C. ORCID: and Smart, C. (1996) Reinterpreting ‘generic structure’: evolution, application and limitations of a concept. System Dynamics Review, 12 (2). pp. 87-120. ISSN 1099-1727

[img] Text - Published Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.


It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199622)12:2<87::AID-SDR98>3.0.CO;2-S


This paper traces the evolution of thegeneric structure concept in system dynamics and discusses the different practical uses to which they have been put. A review of previous work leads to the identification of three different views of what a ‘generic structure’ is and, hence, what transferability means. These different views are distinguishable in application as well as in theory. Examination of these interpretations shows that the assumptions behind them are quite distinct. From this analysis it is argued that it is no longer useful to treat ‘generic structure’ as a single concept since the unity it implies is only superficial. The conclusion is that the concept needs unbundling so that different assumptions about transferability of structure can be made explicit, and the role of generic structures as generalisable theories of dynamic behaviour in system dynamics theory and practice can be debated and clarified more effectively.

Item Type:Article
Divisions:Henley Business School > Business Informatics, Systems and Accounting
ID Code:37960

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation