Accessibility navigation


Lock-up expiry and trading volume behaviour of Malaysian initial public offering's

Zameni, A. P. and Yong, O. (2016) Lock-up expiry and trading volume behaviour of Malaysian initial public offering's. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6 (S3). pp. 12-21. ISSN 2146-4138

[img]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.

585kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Official URL: http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/articl...

Abstract/Summary

The study aims to investigate the lock-up provisions of initial public offering’s (IPOs) and its effects on trading volume changes around the lock-up expiry date of Malaysian IPOs by using both the event study methodology and the comparison period returns approach (CPRA). Unlike the US and the UK, Malaysia’s lock-up length is fixed and the number of shares that should be under the lock-up is pre-determined by the security commission. The sample comprises 379 Malaysian IPOs, issued from January 2001 to December 2011. The results of the event study methodology and CPRA shows a positive abnormal trading volume at lock-up expiry date for IPO market, except for the ACE market, construction and technology sectors, which is negative and is not consistent with our hypothesis and there is no evidence in previous literatures regarding the significant negative trading volume before and after the lock-up. High trading volume at and around the lock-up expiration is compatible with shareholders’ selling due to diversification reasons and wealth recognition and which is also an indication of insider’s lack of confidence about a company’s future prospect. Significant negative trading volume can be interpreted in a way that insiders of those related boards and sectors do not sell their shares significantly but would rather watch what would happen to the market and are optimistic about Market’s future. Furthermore, when we do not adjust the trading volume for the market, the CPRA methodology does not show abnormal trading volume between event window and non-event windows.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Henley Business School > ICMA Centre
ID Code:66402
Additional Information:Special Issue of the International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues for the Asia International Conference (AIC 2015), 5-6 December 2015.
Publisher:EconJournals

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation