Accessibility navigation

Jeu d'écarts: Derrida's Descartes

Thomson, S. (2017) Jeu d'écarts: Derrida's Descartes. Oxford Literary Review, 39 (2). pp. 189-209. ISSN 0305-1498

Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.

[img] Text (Preprint)
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.


It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.3366/olr.2017.0221


This essay tracks the place of Descartes in Derrida's writing, from ‘Cogito et histoire de la folie’ to the late seminars on the beast and the sovereign. Through a heterodox reading of the Cogito, privileging its negative moment, Derrida's Descartes plays an important role in unsettling narratives of philosophical lineage, as well as complicating deconstruction's relationship with method, and with the questions of mastery which haunt Derrida's later work with particular emphasis. What is at stake is not just the mastery of method, but also the mastery that would be involved in escaping or undoing it. Although the aim is not simply to rescue the honour of Descartes, it is suggested that a response to the problems of mastery cannot go without a certain respect for the complexities and uncertainties of an œuvre that is often too easily discarded as the already-read par excellence.

Item Type:Article
Divisions:Arts, Humanities and Social Science > Modern European Histories and Cultures
Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Literature and Languages > English Literature
Arts, Humanities and Social Science > Language Text and Power
ID Code:67254
Publisher:Edinburgh University Press


Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation