Accessibility navigation


A proposed framework for sustainable development in an industrial lowcarbon economy

Li, H. (2017) A proposed framework for sustainable development in an industrial lowcarbon economy. PhD thesis, University of Reading

[img]
Preview
Text - Thesis
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.

4MB
[img] Text - Thesis Deposit Form
· Restricted to Repository staff only

103kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Abstract/Summary

Along with the rapid increase in the size of the global economy, anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions have also increased over the years, intensifying the greenhouse gas effect and increasing the tension between human and natural environments. Governments have set national and industrial targets for reducing CO2 emissions, while research is being carried out to provide theories to investigate sustainable approaches to achieving low-carbon emission to support these strategies. Pigouvian Tax Theory and the Coase Theorem provide theoretical backing for restraining CO2 emissions through economic methods, such as taxation. The Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC), the Theory of Coupling-Decoupling, and the IPAT Function investigate the relationship between economic growth and CO2 emissions; however, their conclusions do not provide sufficient guidance to the industrial activities of low-carbon emission in a lowcarbon economy. Most of the studies in this field are still focusing on individual factors within a low carbon economy; their conclusions represent only part of an overall system. In fact, the industrial low-carbon economy is a complex system with inter-disciplinary elements. We therefore carried out research from the perspective of systems thinking, where industrial low-carbon economy is treated as a holistic system. Based on this principle, this research analyses the low-carbon economy with an improved philosophical and theoretical foundations, building up the research methodology, then selecting and optimising the dimensions and factors for representing this system. Seven dimensions are identified: policy and law, macro-economics, society, industrial technology, industrial economy, carrying capacity and industrial goal. These dimensions and the logic interrelationships among them comprise the dimensional structure model, qualitatively representing this system. Further analysis applying Interpretative Structural Modelling method to the factors from each dimension identified a causal relationships model and a hierarchical structure model, presenting the logic and structure of this system. Population, industrial production technology and industrial technology for CO2 treatment are the key factors for achieving a system to determine the goal of maintaining industrial net profit in the low-carbon economy. The population affects the system’s goal through its influences on industrial GDP and industrial policy for low-carbon emission, while industrial production technology and industrial technology for CO2 pollution treatment influence the system’s goal through their causal effects on the industrial GDP and the amount of CO2 emissions from industrial production. From the hierarchical structure model, the logical relational model is constructed, qualitatively representing the logic within this system, with five sub-models. The models for the industrial sustainable development and the optimal approach to low-carbon emission are constructed to identify the approaches to achieve industrial sustainable development and low-carbon emission, which include maintaining net profit after the cost of reducing CO2 emissions, and improving production technology. The theoretical model for economic growth and CO2 emissions in an industrial low-carbon economy is constructed to illustrate the relationships between economic growth and CO2 emissions, which is a correlation but not causal. Therefore, none of the theories of EKC, Coupling-Decoupling and IPAT Function is tenable. The decision-making models for industrial low-carbon emission policy and industrial fiscal and monetary policy are constructed to indicate the policy-making process and their support in achieving the system’s goal. Together with the first two models, they indicate that policies do not directly determine the amount of reduction of CO2 emissions; therefore, neither Pigouvian Tax Theory nor the Coase Theorem can directly lead to reduction of CO2 emissions. These models are applied to and validated in the Chinese thermal electricity generation industry. They indicate that improvement in industrial production technology can lead to the achievement of both the industrial target for CO2 emissions and this industry’s sustainable development. Although the industrial target of CO2 emissions for 2020 was calculated to be achieved early, by 2016, the 2020 national target for China will not be achieved following current practices. Moreover, there is no causal relationship between Chinese economic growth and the amount of CO2 emissions from this industry. Therefore, there is no causal relationship between GDP and the sum of every industry’s CO2 emissions. The development of the models provides the foundation for this study to be used to investigate analytical and managerial methods towards the reduction of carbon emissions and the achievement of sustainable development for industry in a low-carbon economy, and to identify the relationship between economic growth and CO2 emissions. Most importantly, the research methodology constructed here can be applied as a general paradigm for future research and related policymaking regarding an industrial low-carbon economy. Therefore, this study will fulfill the knowledge gaps in the field of industrial low-carbon economy.

Item Type:Thesis (PhD)
Thesis Supervisor:Tang, Y.
Thesis/Report Department:Henley Business School
Identification Number/DOI:
Divisions:Henley Business School > Business Informatics, Systems and Accounting
ID Code:76168

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation