Understanding (non-) adoption of conservation agriculture in Kenya using the reasoned action approach

Lists

Tools

Van Hulst, F. J. and Posthumus, H. (2016) Understanding (non-) adoption of conservation agriculture in Kenya using the reasoned action approach. Land Use Policy, 56. pp. 303-314. ISSN 0264-8377

Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
1MB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.03.002

Abstract/Summary

In recent years, Conservation Agriculture has been promoted in sub-Saharan Africa as an alternativefarming system for smallholder farmers to address declining soil productivity and climate change. CAhas to be tailored to the agro-ecological and socio-economic context of smallholder farmers to achieveimpact. But even if there is a ‘perfect fit’, the farmer still has his or her own reasons to choose whether toswitch to CA or not. This paper explores the reasons why farmers choose for CA or conventional farming,using the Reasoned Action Approach. Based on findings from a recent study in Kenya among CA farmerfield school members and their neighbours, the farmer’s decision making is analysed by distinguishingthree elements in the decision-making process: the farmer’s attitude towards CA, the farmer’s perceptionof the social norms towards CA, and the farmer’s perceived behavioural control (PBC) over practicing CA.Strong evidence was found that attitude and PBC are contributing to intentions to adopt CA practices. It isconcluded that experimentation and learning are key to support intentions and adoption of CA, becausethey contribute both to realistic attitudes towards CA and an improved perceived behavioural control.

Item Type:	Article
Refereed:	Yes
Divisions:	Interdisciplinary Research Centres (IDRCs) > Walker Institute Interdisciplinary centres and themes > Centre for Food Security Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of Agri-Food Economics & Marketing Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of International Development
ID Code:	80272
Uncontrolled Keywords:	technology adoption; agricultural innovation, small-scale farming
Publisher:	Elsevier

Altmetric

Deposit Details

References

• Ajzen, I., 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50, 179–211. • Arslan, A., Mccarthy, N., Lipper, L., Asfaw, S., Cattaneo, A., 2013. Adoption and intensity of adoption of conservation farming practices in Zambia. "Agriculture, Ecosyst. Environ. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2013.08.017 • Bagozzi, R.P., 1984. Expectancy-value attitude models: an analysis of critical measurement issues. Int. J. Res. Mark. 1, 295–310. • Baudron, F., Jaleta, M., Okitoi, O., Tegegn, A., 2013. Conservation agriculture in African mixed crop-livestock systems: Expanding the niche. "Agriculture, Ecosyst. Environ. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2013.08.020 • Beedell, J., Rehman, T., 2000. Using social-psychology models to understand farmers’ conservation behaviour. J. Rural Stud. 16, 117–127. doi:10.1016/S0743-0167(99)00043-1 • Beuchelt, T.D., Badstue, L., 2013. Gender , nutrition- and climate-smart food production : Opportunities and trade-offs 709–721. doi:10.1007/s12571-013-0290-8 • Burton, R.J.F., 2004. Reconceptualising the “ behavioural approach ” in agricultural studies : a socio-psychological perspective 20, 359–371. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2003.12.001 • Chauhan, B.S., Singh, R.G., Mahajan, G., 2012. Ecology and management of weeds under conservation agriculture: A review. Crop Prot. 57–65. • Conner, M., Armitage, C.J., 1998. Extending the theory of planned behavior: A review and avenues for further research. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. • Corbeels, M., Graaff, J. De, Hycenth, T., Penot, E., Baudron, F., Naudin, K., Andrieu, N., Chirat, G., Schuler, J., Nyagumbo, I., Rusinamhodzi, L., Traore, K., Dulla, H., Solomon, I., 2013. Understanding the impact and adoption of conservation agriculture in Africa: A multi-scale analysis. "Agriculture, Ecosyst. Environ. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2013.10.011 • Cronbach, L.J., 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16, 297–334. • De Graaff, J., A., A., Bodnár, F., Kessler, A., Posthumus, H., Tenge, A., 2008. Factors influencing adoption and continued use of long-term soil and water conservation measures in five developing countries. Appl. Geogr. 28, 271–280. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2008.05.001 • Eisinga, R., Grotenhuis, M. te, Pelzer, B., 2013. The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown? Int. J. Public Health 58, 637–42. doi:10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3 • Ellis-Jones, J., Mason, T., 1999. Livelihood strategies and assets of small farmers in the evaluation of soil and water management practices in the temperate inter-Andean valleys of Bolivia. Mt. Res. Dev. 19, 221–234. • Fishbein, M., 1963. An investigation of relationships between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward that object. Hum. Relations 16, 233–240. • Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I., 2010. Predicting and changing behavior; the reasoned action approach. Taylor & Francis Group, New York. • Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I., 1975. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading. • Gagné, C., Godin, G., 2000. The theory of planned behavior: Some measurement issues concerning belief-based variables. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 30, 2173–2193. • Giller, K.E., Corbeels, M., Nyamangara, J., Triomphe, B., Affholder, F., Scopel, E., Tittonell, P., 2011. A research agenda to explore the role of conservation agriculture in African smallholder farming systems. F. Crop. Res. 124, 468–472. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2011.04.010 • Giller, K.E., Witter, E., Corbeels, M., Tittonell, P., 2009. Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa: The heretics’ view. F. Crop. Res. 114, 23–34. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2009.06.017 • Gowing, J.W., Palmer, M., 2008. Sustainable agricultural development in sub-Saharan Africa: the case for a paradigm shift in land husbandry. Soil Use Manag. 24, 92–99. doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.2007.00137.x • Hall, A., Janssen, W., Pehu, E., Rajalahti, R., 2007. Enhancing Agricultural Innovation, How to go beyond the strengthening of research systems. The World Bank, Washington, DC. • Hobbs, P.R., Sayre, K., Gupta, R., 2008. The role of conservation agriculture in sustainable agriculture. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 363, 543–55. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2169 • Kaiser, F.G., 2006. A moral extension of the theory of planned behavior: Norms and anticipated feelings of regret in conservationism. Pers. Individ. Dif. 41, 71–81. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.028 • Kaumbutho, P., Kienzle, J. (Eds.), 2007. Conservation agriculture as practised in Kenya: two case studies. African Conservation Tillage Network (ACT); Centre de Coopération Internationale de Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Nairobi. • Knowler, D., Bradshaw, B., 2007. Farmers ’ adoption of conservation agriculture : A review and synthesis of recent research 32, 25–48. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.01.003 • Lynne, G.D., Franklin Casey, C., Hodges, A., Rahmani, M., 1995. Conservation technology adoption decisions and the theory of planned behavior. J. Econ. Psychol. 16, 581–598. doi:10.1016/0167-4870(95)00031-6 • Lynne, G.D., Shonkwiler, J.S., Rola, L.R., 1988. Improving attitude-behaviour prediction models with economic variables: farmer actions toward soil conservation. J. Soc. Psychol. 128, 19–28. • Mazvimavi, K., Twomlow, S., 2009. Socioeconomic and institutional factors influencing adoption of conservation farming by vulnerable households in Zimbabwe. Agric. Syst. 101, 20–29. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2009.02.002 • Min. of Agr., 2013. Laikipia East, Conservation Agriculture Brief. Nanyuki. • Ndah, H.T., Schuler, J., Uthes, S., Zander, P., Triomphe, B., Mkomwa, S., Corbeels, M., 2015. Adoption Potential for Conservation Agriculture in Africa: A Newly Developed Assessment Approach (QAToCA) Applied in Kenya and Tanzania. L. Degrad. Dev. 26, 133–141. doi:10.1002/ldr.2191 • Notter, B., MacMillan, L., Viviroli, D., Weingartner, R., Liniger, H.-P., 2007. Impacts of environmental change on water resources in the Mt. Kenya region. J. Hydrol. 343, 266 – 278. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.06.022 • Pelling, E.L., White, K.M., 2009. The theory of planned behavior applied to young people’s use of social networking Web sites. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 12, 755–9. doi:10.1089/cpb.2009.0109 • Posthumus, H., Pound, B., Andrieu, N., Triomphe, B., 2011. Enhancing adoption of conservation agriculture practices through co-innovation platforms in sub-Saharan Africa, in: 5th World Congress of Conservation Agriculture. Brisbane. • Prager, K., Posthumus, H., 2010. Socio-economic factors influencing farmers’ adoption of soil conservation practices in europe, in: Napier, T.L. (Ed.), Human Dimensions of Soil and Water Conservation. Nova Science Publishers, Inc. • Röling, N., 2009. Pathways for impact: scientists’ different perspectives on agricultural innovation. Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 83–94. • Röling, N., Hounkonnou, D., Kossou, D., Kuyper, T.W., Nederlof, S., Sakyi-Dawson, O., Traoré, M., van Huis, A., 2012. Diagnosing the scope for innovation: Linking smallholder practices and institutional context. NJAS - Wageningen J. Life Sci. 60-63, 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.njas.2012.06.004 • Sijtsma, K., 2009. On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha. Psychometrika 74, 107–120. doi:10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0 • Ten Berge, J.M.F., Sočan, G., 2004. The greatest lower bound to the reliability of a test and the hypothesis of unidimensionality. Psychometrika 69, 613–625. doi:10.1007/BF02289858 • Tittonell, P., Scopel, E., Andrieu, N., Posthumus, H., Mapfumo, P., Corbeels, M., van Halsema, G.E., Lahmar, R., Lugandu, S., Rakotoarisoa, J., Mtambanengwe, F., Pound, B., Chikowo, R., Naudin, K., Triomphe, B., Mkomwa, S., 2012. Agroecology-based aggradation-conservation agriculture (ABACO): Targeting innovations to combat soil degradation and food insecurity in semi-arid Africa. F. Crop. Res. 132, 168–174. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2011.12.011 • Trumbo, C.W., O’Keefe, G.J., 2005. Intention to Conserve Water: Environmental Values, Reasoned Action, and Information Effects Across Time. Soc. Nat. Resour. 18, 573–585. doi:10.1080/08941920590948002 • Ulrich, A., Ifejika Speranza, C., Roden, P., Kiteme, B., Wiesmann, U., Nüsser, M., 2012. Small-scale farming in semi-arid areas: Livelihood dynamics between 1997 and 2010 in Laikipia, Kenya. J. Rural Stud. 28, 241–251. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.02.003 • Van Hulst, F.J., Posthumus, H., 2014. Understanding (non-)adoption of CA: contributions from Social Psychology, in: 1st Africa Congress on Conservation Agriculture. Lusaka. • Wauters, E., Bielders, C., Poesen, J., Govers, G., Mathijs, E., 2010. Adoption of soil conservation practices in Belgium: An examination of the theory of planned behaviour in the agri-environmental domain. Land use policy 27, 86–94. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.02.009 • Yazdanpanah, M., Hayati, D., Hochrainer-Stigler, S., Zamani, G.H., 2014. Understanding farmers’ intention and behavior regarding water conservation in the Middle-East and North Africa: a case study in Iran. J. Environ. Manage. 135, 63–72. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.016

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

University of Reading

CentAUR: Central Archive at the University of Reading

Accessibility navigation

Understanding (non-) adoption of conservation agriculture in Kenya using the reasoned action approach

Abstract/Summary

Page navigation

See also

Footer navigation