Clements, M. P.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6329-1341
(2021)
Do survey joiners and leavers differ from regular participants?
International Journal of Forecasting, 37 (2).
pp. 634-646.
ISSN 0169-2070
Preview |
Text
- Accepted Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. · Please see our End User Agreement before downloading. 191kB |
It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.
To link to this item DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2020.08.003
Abstract/Summary
If learning-by-doing is important for macro-forecasting, newcomers might be different to regular, established particants. Stayers may also differ from the soon-to-leave. We test these conjectures for macro-forecasters' point predictions of output growth and inflation, and for their histogram forecasts. Histogram forecasts of inflation by both joiners and leavers are found to be less accurate, especially if we suppose that joiners take time to learn. For GDP growth, there is no evidence for differences between the groups in terms of histogram forecast accuracy, although leavers GDP point forecasts are less accurate. These findings are predicated on forecasters being homogeneous within groups. Allowing for individual fixed effects suggests fewer differences, including leavers' inflation histogram forecasts being no less accurate.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Divisions: | Henley Business School > Finance and Accounting |
| ID Code: | 92753 |
| Publisher: | Elsevier |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record
Lists
Lists