Germain, S.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2697-6039 and Newdick, C.
(2025)
Priority setting for health equality – searching for an ethical framework.
Health Economics, Policy and Law.
pp. 1-14.
ISSN 1744-134X
doi: 10.1017/s1744133125100224
Abstract/Summary
Compounded by 14 years of public welfare austerity, health equality presents a challenge that extends beyond healthcare in isolation because it also engages the more recondite politics of public health. Recent policy has addressed the issue by requiring National Health Service (NHS) bodies to integrate their services with those of local authorities. We consider how this adds significant new difficulty to the already complex process of NHS resource allocation. We argue that these duties require a new framework to gauge the values, evidence and criteria needed to set priorities for public health; not simply as a desirable objective, but a necessity in law. We consider current approaches to priority setting for medical treatment, and the responses already offered by current ethical frameworks. We then discuss the new ethical, political, and practical challenges posed by public health priority setting for health equality. Informed by this context, we engage an intersectional lens to explore a ‘non-ideal’ solution grounded in Professor Sir Michael Marmot’s framework to reduce health inequalities.
Altmetric Badge
Dimensions Badge
| Item Type | Article |
| URI | https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/125529 |
| Identification Number/DOI | 10.1017/s1744133125100224 |
| Refereed | Yes |
| Divisions | Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| Download/View statistics | View download statistics for this item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record
Download
Download