Excellent disobedience: a virtue theoretical account of civility in civil disobedience

[thumbnail of Lee_Thesis.pdf]
Preview
Text
- Thesis
[thumbnail of Lee_form.pdf]
Text
- Thesis Deposit Form
· Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Lee, T. M. (2026) Excellent disobedience: a virtue theoretical account of civility in civil disobedience. PhD thesis, University of Reading. doi: 10.48683/1926.00130766

Abstract/Summary

This thesis examines the conceptual relationship between civility and civil disobedience. Standard accounts of civil disobedience, though debated, typically emphasize publicity, communication, non-violence, and respect for law. They also frequently invoke “civility”, but without comparable clarity or depth. This under-theorization obscures what, if anything, civility demands of civil disobedience and undermines our ability to assess the apparent distinction between civil and uncivil forms of dissent. I argue that existing treatments of civility in this context are unsatisfactory in two main ways. “Inside-out” treatments derive civility from prior conceptions of civil disobedience, rendering its demands parasitic rather than distinctly civil. “Outside-in” treatments treat civility independently, but often implicitly or without sufficient depth thus, leaving civility’s significance unclear. To address these problems, I develop an account of civility independently of civil disobedience, and only then apply it. Drawing on the civility literature, I defend an “ethical” rather than “political” understanding of civility and argue that it is best conceived as an excellent character trait, i.e., a virtue. I develop a virtue-theoretical account, Civility as a Virtue: civility is a disposition to respond positively to formalities in ways that assure and esteem in social interaction. I show that civility is indeed plausibly a virtue (as it is often called), it is not inherently supportive of the status quo, and it can accommodate the possibility of righteous incivility. I then apply this account to civil disobedience. Drawing on the paradigmatic cases of Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King jr. I argue for a qualified agent approach: the civility of civil disobedience consists in agents acting as we would expect civil persons to characteristically act in the circumstances. On this basis, I develop a civility-focused, virtue-theoretic account of civil disobedience that remains recognizably civil disobedience while offering a more parsimonious and flexible explanation of its standard associations with non-violence, respect for law, and public communication. Thus, civility is a central and potentially unifying part of civil disobedience.

Altmetric Badge

Dimensions Badge

Item Type Thesis (PhD)
URI https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/130766
Identification Number/DOI 10.48683/1926.00130766
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Politics, Economics and International Relations > Politics and International Relations
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record