Social Impact Theory: an examination of how immediacy operates as an influence upon social media interaction in Facebook fan pagesPerez Vega, R. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1619-317X, Waite, K. and O'Gorman, K. (2016) Social Impact Theory: an examination of how immediacy operates as an influence upon social media interaction in Facebook fan pages. The Marketing Review, 16 (3). pp. 299-321. ISSN 1472-1384
It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing. To link to this item DOI: 10.1362/146934716X14636478977791 Abstract/SummaryThis paper proposes that Social Influence Theory is an appropriate approach for understanding social media interaction. Increasingly organisations are looking for ways to develop an effective presence in social media to increase awareness, customer satisfaction, sales and consumer engagement with the brand. The influence of interpersonal interaction upon attitude, beliefs and behaviour, has been studied within social psychology. Different forms of immediacy: physical, temporal and social are theorised as exerting distinct influences upon individual behaviours. This paper reviews the concept of social influence and introduces social impact theory (SIT) a conceptual framework to guide research enquiry and inform practice within the social media marketing. It examines in detail the concept of immediacy and indicates how an understanding of immediacy might explain Facebook behaviours
DownloadsDownloads per month over past year
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
• Akar, E., & Topçu, B. (2011). An examination of the factors influencing consumers' attitudes toward social media marketing. Journal of Internet Commerce, 10(1), 35-67. doi: 10.1080/15332861.2011.558456
• Alhabash, S., McAlister, A. R., Hagerstrom, A., Quilliam, E. T., Rifon, N. J., & Richards, J. I. (2013). Between likes and shares: Effects of emotional appeal and virality on the persuasiveness of anticyberbullying messages on Facebook.Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(3), 175-182. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0265
• Argo, J. J., Dahl, D. W., & Manchanda, R. V. (2005). The influence of a mere social presence in a retail context. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(2), 207-212. doi: 10.1086/432230
• Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. Groups, leadership, and men, 222-236.
• Backstrom, L., Sun, E., & Marlow, C. (2010, April). Find me if you can: improving geographical prediction with social and spatial proximity. InProceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web (pp. 61-70). ACM. doi: 10.1145/1772690.1772698
• Banerjee, A. V. (1992). A simple model of herd behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 797-817. doi: 10.2307/2118364
• Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2006). The association between psychological distance and construal level: evidence from an implicit association test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(4), 609. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.609
• Bassett, R. L., & Latane, B. (1976). Social influences and news stories. In meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, 343-356.
• Blank, G. (2013). Who creates content? Stratification and content creation on the Internet. Information, Communication & Society, 16(4), 590-612. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.777758
• Blaskovich, J. L. (2008). Exploring the effect of distance: an experimental investigation of virtual collaboration, social loafing, and group decisions. Journal of Information Systems, 22(1), 27-46. doi: 10.2308/jis.2008.22.1.27
• Borle, S., Dholakia, U., Singh, S., & Durham, E. (2012). An empirical investigation of the impact of Facebook fan page participation on customer behavior. Marketing Science, 52(2), 1-36.
• Bourgeois, M. J., & Bowen, A. (2001). Self-organization of alcohol-related attitudes and beliefs in a campus housing complex: an initial investigation. Health Psychology, 20(6), 434. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.20.6.434
• Bowden, J. (2009). Customer engagement: A framework for assessing customer-brand relationships: The case of the restaurant industry. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 18(6), 574-596. doi: 10.1080/19368620903024983
• Bradner, E., & Mark, G. (2002, November). Why distance matters: effects on cooperation, persuasion and deception. In Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 226-235). ACM. doi: 10.1145/587078.587110
• Brandtzæg, P. B., Lüders, M., & Skjetne, J. H. (2010). Too many Facebook “friends”? Content sharing and sociability versus the need for privacy in social network sites. Intl. Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 26(11-12), 1006-1030. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2010.516719
• Brodie, R. J., Hollebeek, L. D., Juric, B., & Ilic, A. (2011). Customer engagement: conceptual domain, fundamental propositions, and implications for research. Journal of Service Research, 14(3), 252-271. doi: 10.1177/1094670511411703
• Brown, J. J., & Reingen, P. H. (1987). Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. Journal of Consumer research, 14 (3), 350-362.
• Castaño, R., Sujan, M., Kacker, M., & Sujan, H. (2008). Managing consumer uncertainty in the adoption of new products: temporal distance and mental simulation. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(3), 320-336. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.45.3.320
• Charness, G., Haruvy, E., & Sonsino, D. (2007). Social distance and reciprocity: An Internet experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63(1), 88-103. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2005.04.021
• Chidambaram, L., & Tung, L. L. (2005). Is out of sight, out of mind? An empirical study of social loafing in technology-supported groups. Information Systems Research, 16(2), 149-168. doi: 10.1287/isre.1050.0051
• Cho, Y. H., Wang, Y., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2002). Searching for experiences: The web-based virtual tour in tourism marketing. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 12(4), 1-17. doi 10.1300/J073v12n04_01
• Chu, S. C., & Kim, Y. (2011). Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. International Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 47-75.
• Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 55, 591-621. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
• Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. Gilbert, Daniel T. (Ed); Fiske, Susan T. (Ed); Lindzey, Gardner (Ed). The handbook of social psychology, Vols. 1 and 2 (4th ed.). , (pp. 151-192). New York, NY, US: McGraw-Hill, x, 1085 pp.
• Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances in experimental social psychology, 24(20), 1-243.
• Conaway, R. N., Easton, S. S., & Schmidt, W. V. (2005). Strategies for enhancing student interaction and immediacy in online courses. Business Communication Quarterly, 68(1), 23-35. doi: 10.1177/1080569904273300
• Content Marketing Institute (2014). New Content Marketing Research: B2C Challenged with Measurement [Website] Available from: <http://contentmarketinginstitute.com/2014/10/2015-b2c-consumer-content-marketing/> [Accessed on: 02/04/2015].
• Cova, B., & Dalli, D. (2009). Working consumers: the next step in marketing theory?. Marketing theory, 9(3), 315-339. doi: 10.1177/1470593109338144
• Cox, J. C., & Deck, C. A. (2005). On the nature of reciprocal motives. Economic Inquiry, 43(3), 623-635. doi: 10.1093/ei/cbi043
• Darwell, B. (2012). Facebook launches 'global pages' for brands to offer localized experiences [Website] Available from:< http://www.insidefacebook.com/2012/10/17/facebook-launches-global-pages-for-brands-to-offer-localized-experiences/> [Accessed on: 27-05-2014].
• Daugherty, T., Eastin, M. S., & Bright, L. (2008). Exploring consumer motivations for creating user-generated content. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 8(2), 16-25. doi:10.1080/15252019.2008.10722139
• De Vries, L., Gensler, S., & Leeflang, P. S. (2012). Popularity of brand posts on brand fan pages: an investigation of the effects of social media marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(2), 83-91. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2012.01.003
• DeRosa, D. M., Hantula, D. A., Kock, N., & D'Arcy, J. (2004). Trust and leadership in virtual teamwork: A media naturalness perspective. Human Resource Management, 43(2‐3), 219-232. doi: 10.1002/hrm.20016
• Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The journal of abnormal and social psychology, 51(3), 629. doi 10.1037/h0046408
• DeWall, C. N., Twenge, J. M., Bushman, B., Im, C., & Williams, K. (2010). A Little Acceptance Goes a Long Way Applying Social Impact Theory to the Rejection–Aggression Link. Social Psychological and Personality Science,1(2), 168-174. doi: 10.1177/1948550610361387
• Dholakia, U. M., & Durham, E. (2010). One café chain’s Facebook experiment. Harvard Business Review, 88(3), 26.
• Dholakia, U. M., Bagozzi, R. P., & Pearo, L. K. (2004). A social influence model of consumer participation in network-and small-group-based virtual communities. International journal of research in marketing, 21(3), 241-263. doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2003.12.004.
• DiFonzo, N., Bourgeois, M. J., Suls, J., Homan, C., Stupak, N., Brooks, B. P. & Bordia, P. (2013). Rumor clustering, consensus, and polarization: Dynamic social impact and self-organization of hearsay. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 378-399. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.12.010
• Eckel, C. C., & Wilson, R. K. (2004). Is trust a risky decision?. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55(4), 447-465. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2003.11.003
• eMarketer (2013). Social’s Value Measured in Engagement Over Sales [Website]. Avaailable from: <http://www.emarketer.com/Article/Socials-Value-Measured-Engagement-Over-Sales/1010116> [Accessed: 04/03/2015].
• eMarketer (2014). Better Measurement, Metrics Needed for Engagement [Website]. Available from: < http://www.emarketer.com/Article/Better-Measurement-Metrics-Needed-Engagement/1010684>. [Accessed: 15-08-2014].
• ExactTarget (2010). Facebook x-factors [Website]. Available from:<http://pages.exacttarget.com/SFF5-US?ls=Website&lss=SubscribersFansFollowersFacebookX&lssm=Corporate&camp=701A00000005OadIAE> [Accessed on : 18-08-2014].
• Facebook (2014). The Like Button [Website]. Available from: < https://www.facebook.com/like> [Accessed on: 01-09-2014].
• Fink, E. L. (1996). Dynamic social impact theory and the study of human communication. Journal of Communication, 46(4), 4-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01500.x
• Fitzgerald Bone, P. (1992). Determinants of Word-Of-Mouth Communications During Product Consumption. Advances in consumer research, 19(1).
• Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: the affect infusion model (AIM).Psychological bulletin, 117(1), 39. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.39
• Fournier, S., & Avery, J. (2011). The uninvited brand. Business Horizons,54(3), 193-207. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.001
• Gamble, J., & Gilmore, A. (2013). A new era of consumer marketing? An application of co-creational marketing in the music industry. European Journal of Marketing, 47(11/12), 5-5. doi: 10.1108/EJM-10-2011-0584
• Ganesan, S., Malter, A. J., & Rindfleisch, A. (2005). Does distance still matter? Geographic proximity and new product development. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 44-60. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.44
• Goldberg, S. C. (1954). Three situational determinants of conformity to social norms. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49(3), 325. doi: 10.1037/h0056249
• Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology, 1360-1380. doi: 10.1086/268018
• Griffith, D. A., & Chen, Q. (2004). The influence of virtual direct experience (VDE) on on-line ad message effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 33(1), 55-68. doi: 10.1080/00913367.2004.10639153
• Guadagno, R., & Cialdini, R. B. (2005). Online persuasion and compliance: Social influence on the Internet and beyond. The social net: Human behavior in cyberspace, 91-113.
• Hardey, M. (2011). Generation C: content, creation, connections and choice. International Journal of Market Research, 53(6), 749-770.
• Hargittai, E., & Walejko, G. (2008). The Participation Divide: Content creation and sharing in the digital age 1. Information, Community and Society, 11(2), 239-256. doi: 10.1080/13691180801946150
• Harris, L., & Dennis, C. (2011). Engaging customers on Facebook: Challenges for e‐retailers. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 10(6), 338-346. doi: 10.1002/cb.375
• Hart, J. W., Stasson, M. F., & Karau, S. J. (1999). Effects of source expertise and physical distance on minority influence. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 3(1), 81. doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.3.1.81
• Haythornthwaite, C., Kazmer, M. M., Robins, J., & Shoemaker, S. (2000). Community development among distance learners: Temporal and technological dimensions. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 6(1), 0-0. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2000.tb00114.x
• Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Psychology Press.
• Hoch, S. J., & Loewenstein, G. F. (1991). Time-inconsistent preferences and consumer self-control. Journal of Consumer Research, 492-507.
• Hoffman, D. L., & Fodor, M. (2010). Can you measure the ROI of your social media marketing?. Sloan Management Review, 52(1).
• Hollebeek, L. D. (2011). Demystifying customer brand engagement: Exploring the loyalty nexus. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(7-8), 785-807. doi: 10.1080/0267257X.2010.500132
• Hornik, J., & Schlinger, M. J. (1981). Allocation of time to the mass media. Journal of Consumer Research, 343-355.
• Hyun, M. Y., & O'Keefe, R. M. (2012). Virtual destination image: Testing a telepresence model. Journal of Business Research, 65(1), 29-35. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.011
• Jackson, J. M. (1986). In defense of Social Impact Theory: Comment on Mullen. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), 511-513. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.511
• Jackson, J. M., & Latane, B. (1982). Experimenter immediacy and social loafing. Paper presented at the 54th annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Minneapolis, MN.
• Jacoby, J., Szybillo, G. J., & Berning, C. K. (1976). Time and consumer behavior: An interdisciplinary overview. Journal of Consumer Research, 320-339.
• Jahn, B., & Kunz, W. (2012). How to transform consumers into fans of your brand. Journal of Service Management, 23(3), 344-361. doi:10.1108/09564231211248444
• Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological review, 93(2), 136. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.136
• Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business horizons, 53(1), 59-68. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
• Karahasanović, A., Brandtzæg, P. B., Heim, J., Lüders, M., Vermeir, L., Pierson, J., & Jans, G. (2009). Co-creation and user-generated content–elderly people’s user requirements. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(3), 655-678. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.012
• Keenan, A., & Shiri, A. (2009). Sociability and social interaction on social networking websites. Library Review, 58(6), 438-450. doi: 10.1108/00242530910969794
• Kim, J., & Hardin, A. (2010). The impact of virtual worlds on word-of-mouth: Improving social networking and servicescape in the hospitality industry. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 19(7), 735-753. doi: 10.1080/19368623.2010.508005
• Klein, L. R. (2003). Creating virtual product experiences: the role of telepresence. Journal of interactive Marketing, 17(1), 41-55. doi: 10.1002/dir.10046
• Knowles, E. S. (1983). Social physics and the effects of others: Tests of the effects of audience size and distance on social judgments and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(6), 1263-1279. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.45.6.1263
• Konczal, J. (2008). Identifying, Knowing And Retaining Your Customers: The``Prosumer''. Customer Interaction Solutions, 26(11), 22.
• Kozinets, R. V. (1999). E-tribalized marketing?: The strategic implications of virtual communities of consumption. European Management Journal, 17(3), 252-264. DOI: 10.1016/S0263-2373(99)00004-3. doi: 10.1016/S0263-2373(99)00004-3
• Kozinets, R. V., De Valck, K., Wojnicki, A. C., & Wilner, S. J. (2010). Networked narratives: understanding word-of-mouth marketing in online communities. Journal of marketing, 74(2), 71-89.
• Kwahk, K. Y., & Ge, X. (2012). The Effects of Social Media on E-Commerce: A Perspective of Social Impact Theory. In System Science (HICSS), 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 1814-1823). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2012.564
• Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American psychologist,36(4), 343. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.36.4.343
• Latané, B., & L'Herrou, T. (1996). Spatial clustering in the conformity game: Dynamic social impact in electronic groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1218. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1218
• Latané, B., & Liu, J. H. (1996). The intersubjective geometry of social space. Journal of Communication, 46(4), 26-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01502.x
• Latané, B., & Wolf, S. (1981). The social impact of majorities and minorities. Psychological Review, 88(5), 438. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.438
• Latané, B., Liu, J. H., Nowak, A., Bonevento, M., & Zheng, L. (1995). Distance matters: Physical space and social impact. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(8), 795-805. doi: 10.1177/0146167295218002
• Lee, D., Kim, H. S., & Kim, J. K. (2011). The impact of online brand community type on consumer's community engagement behaviors: consumer-created vs. marketer-created online brand community in online social-networking web sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(1-2), 59-63. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0397.
• Leonard-Barton, D. (1985). Experts as negative opinion leaders in the diffusion of a technological innovation. Journal of Consumer Research, 914-926. doi: 10.2307/2489217
• Li, Y. M., Lee, Y. L., & Lien, N. J. (2012). Online social advertising via influential endorsers. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16(3), 119-154. doi: 10.2753/JEC1086-4415160305
• Libai, B., Bolton, R., Bügel, M. S., De Ruyter, K., Götz, O., Risselada, H., & Stephen, A. T. (2010). Customer-to-customer interactions: broadening the scope of word of mouth research. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 267-282. doi: 10.1177/1094670510375600
• Liben-Nowell, D., Novak, J., Kumar, R., Raghavan, P., & Tomkins, A. (2005). Geographic routing in social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(33), 11623-11628. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503018102
• Lim, S., Cha, S. Y., Park, C., Lee, I., & Kim, J. (2012). Getting closer and experiencing together: Antecedents and consequences of psychological distance in social media-enhanced real-time streaming video. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1365-1378. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.02.022
• Liu, Y., & Shrum, L. J. (2002). What is interactivity and is it always such a good thing? Implications of definition, person, and situation for the influence of interactivity on advertising effectiveness. Journal of advertising, 31(4), 53-64. doi: 10.1080/00913367.2002.10673685
• Mackie, D. M. (1987). Systematic and nonsystematic processing of majority and minority persuasive communications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(1), 41. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.41
• Mangleburg, T. F., Doney, P. M., & Bristol, T. (2004). Shopping with friends and teens’ susceptibility to peer influence. Journal of Retailing, 80(2), 101-116. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2004.04.005
• Mangold, W. G., & Faulds, D. J. (2009). Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business horizons, 52(4), 357-365. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.03.002
• Marketing Science Institute (2014). Understanding Customers and the Customer Experience [Website]. Available from:< http://www.msi.org/research/2014-2016-research-priorities/tier-1-understanding-customers-and-the-customer-experience/> [Accessed on: 15-08-2014].
• Markovsky, B., & Thye, S. R. (2001). Social influence on paranormal beliefs. Sociological Perspectives, 44(1), 21-44. doi: 10.1525/sop.2001.44.1.21
• Meyers-Levy, J., & Maheswaran, D. (1992). When timing matters: The influence of temporal distance on consumers' affective and persuasive responses. Journal of Consumer Research, 424-433. doi: 10.2307/2489399
• Miller, M. D., & Cryss Brunner, C. (2008). Social impact in technologically-mediated communication: An examination of online influence. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 2972-2991. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.05.004
• Mok, D., Wellman, B., & Carrasco, J. (2010). Does distance matter in the age of the Internet?. Urban Studies, 47(13), 2747-2783. doi: 10.1177/0042098010377363
• Moon, Y. (1999). The effects of physical distance and response latency on persuasion in computer-mediated communication and human–computer communication. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5(4), 379. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.5.4.379
• Moscovici, S. (1980). Toward a theory of conversion behavior. Advances in experimental social psychology, 13, 209-239.
• Mullen, B. (1985). Strength and immediacy of sources: A meta-analytic evaluation of the forgotten elements of social impact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(6), 1458. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1458
• Naylor, R. W., Lamberton, C. P., & West, P. M. (2012). Beyond the “like” button: The impact of mere virtual presence on brand evaluations and purchase intentions in social media settings. Journal of Marketing, 76(6), 105-120. doi: 10.1509/jm.11.0105
• O'Connor, P. (2010). Managing a hotel's image on TripAdvisor. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 19(7), 754-772. doi: 10.1080/19368623.2010.508007
• Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human-computer interaction, 15(2), 139-178. doi: 10.1207/S15327051HCI1523_4
• Owyang, J. (2010). A collection of social network stats for 2010. Web Strategy,19.
• Pedersen, E. R., LaBrie, J. W., & Lac, A. (2008). Assessment of perceived and actual alcohol norms in varying contexts: Exploring Social Impact Theory among college students. Addictive behaviors, 33(4), 552-564. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.11.003
• Penrod, S., & Hastie, R. (1979). Models of jury decision making: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 462. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.462
• Penrod, S., & Hastie, R. (1980). A computer simulation of jury decision making. Psychological Review, 87(2), 133-159. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.87.2.133
• Poynter, R. (2008). Viewpoint-Facebook: The future of networking with customers. Journal of the Market Research Society, 50(1), 11.
• Preece, J. (2000). Online communities: Designing usability and supporting socialbilty. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
• Qualman, E. (2012). Socialnomics: How social media transforms the way we live and do business. John Wiley & Sons.
• Reingen, P. H., & Kernan, J. B. (1986). Analysis of referral networks in marketing: Methods and illustration. Journal of Marketing Research, 370-378. doi: 10.2307/3151813
• Rosette, A. S., Brett, J. M., Barsness, Z., & Lytle, A. L. (2012). When cultures clash electronically: The impact of email and social norms on negotiation behavior and outcomes. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(4), 628-643. doi: 10.1177/0022022111407190
• Schultz, D. E., & Peltier, J. J. (2013). Social media's slippery slope: challenges, opportunities and future research directions. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 7(2), 86-99. doi: 10.1108/JRIM-12-2012-0054
• Sedikides, C., & Jackson, J. M. (1990). Social impact theory: A field test of source strength, source immediacy and number of targets. Basic and applied social psychology, 11(3), 273-281. doi: 10.1207/s15324834basp1103_4
• Seta, J. J., Crisson, J. E., Seta, C. E., & Wang, M. A. (1989). Task performance and perceptions of anxiety: Averaging and summation in an evaluative setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(3), 387. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.56.3.387
• Shen, C. C., & Chiou, J. S. (2010). The impact of perceived ease of use on Internet service adoption: The moderating effects of temporal distance and perceived risk. Computers in human behavior, 26(1), 42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.07.003
• Shih, C. F. E. (1998). Conceptualizing consumer experiences in cyberspace. European Journal of Marketing, 32(7/8), 655-663. doi: 10.1108/03090569810224056
• Singh, S. (2009). Social media marketing for dummies. John Wiley & Sons.
• Smith, R., Deitz, G., Royne, M. B., Hansen, J. D., Grünhagen, M., & Witte, C. (2013). Cross-cultural examination of online shopping behavior: A comparison of Norway, Germany, and the United States. Journal of Business Research,66(3), 328-335. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.08.013
• Sorrels, J. P., & Kelley, J. (1984). Conformity by omission. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10(2), 302-305. doi: 10.1177/0146167284102017
• Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of communication, 42(4), 73-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x
• Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. Advances in experimental social psychology, 21, 181-227. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60227-0
• Tran, L., Cebrian, M., Krumme, C., & Pentland, A. (2011). Social distance drives the convergence of preferences in an online music sharing network. In Privacy, security, risk and trust (passat), 2011 ieee third international conference on and 2011 ieee third international conference on social computing (socialcom) (637-640). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/PASSAT/SocialCom.2011.195
• Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological review, 117(2), 440-463. doi: 10.1037/a0018963
• Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. Advances in group processes, 2, 77-122.
• Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
• Wellman, B., Hogan, B., Berg, K., Boase, J., Carrasco, J. A., Côté, R. & Tran, P. (2006). Connected Lives: The Project1. In Networked neighbourhoods (pp. 161-216). Springer London. doi: 10.1007/1-84628-601-8_8
• Williams, K. D., & Williams, K. B. (1989). Impact of source strength on two compliance techniques. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10(2), 149-159. doi: 10.1207/s15324834basp1002_5
• Wirtz, J., & Chew, P. (2002). The effects of incentives, deal proneness, satisfaction and tie strength on word-of-mouth behaviour. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 13(2), 141-162. doi: 10.1108/09564230210425340
• Wolf, S., & Bugaj, A. M. (1990). The social impact of courtroom witnesses. Social Behaviour, 5 (1), 1-13.
• Woodfield, K., Morrell, G., Metzler, K., Blank, G., Salmons, J., Finnegan, J., & Lucraft, M. (2013). Blurring the Boundaries? New social media, new social research: Developing a network to explore the issues faced by researchers negotiating the new research landscape of online social media platforms. NCRM Working Paper. NCRM.
• Woods, R. H., & Baker, J. D. (2004). Interaction and immediacy in online learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5 (2), 1-13.
• Xiang, Z., & Gretzel, U. (2010). Role of social media in online travel information search. Tourism management, 31(2), 179-188. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2009.02.016 University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record |