Synthesis of a leadership model for DevOps adoption

Lists

Tools

Maroukian, K. and Gulliver, S. R. (2022) Synthesis of a leadership model for DevOps adoption. In: ESSE 2021: 2nd European Symposium on Software Engineering, Nov. 6-8, 2021, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece,, pp. 58-66, https://doi.org/10.1145/3501774.3501783.

Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.
432kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1145/3501774.3501783

Abstract/Summary

The first decade of DevOps-orientation in software-intensive organizational environments is often characterized with an emerging set of skills that support DevOps practice adoption, targeting a cross-functional collaborative culture; with an aim of achieving a shift in mindset, skillset, and toolset. We investigate DevOps adoption constructs to facilitate development of a formative measurement model to support leadership throughout the DevOps transitional journey. The model and its constructs are designed and validated with a multi-method approach. Initially an exploratory study of a survey is conducted with 250 respondents 76% of whom possess leadership roles, 93% work in Europe and Middle East, and two-thirds are practicing as DevOps practitioners. Pertinent model indicators are produced and grouped under constructs based on survey results and validated using PLS-SEM. The formative structural model is presented and validated in three separate focus group sessions, comprising of respectively seven (7), five (5), and seven (7) participants all of whom had held leadership positions; from countries including USA, UK, The Netherlands, UAE, Greece, Georgia, Switzerland. Seventeen (17) focus group participants provided additional responses through a focus group in-session survey, which allowed feedback on specific model constructs. Results indicate that a set of practices, a set of skills, a set of metrics, DevOps adoption planning and the existence of the DevOps adoption leader roles, should be part of organizational aspirations in the definition of leadership in a DevOps transition path.

Item Type:	Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Refereed:	Yes
Divisions:	Henley Business School > Business Informatics, Systems and Accounting
ID Code:	99402
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Leadership model, DevOps, Survey, Focus group, PLS-SEM

Altmetric

Deposit Details

References

[1] Verner, J., Sampson J., Cerpa, N. 2008. What factors lead to software project failure?, In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science, pp. 71-80. doi: 10.1109/RCIS.2008.4632095. Marrakech, Morocco. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/RCIS.2008.4632095. [2] Welder Pinheiro Luz, Gustavo Pinto and Rodrigo Bonifácio. 2019. Adopting DevOps in the real world: A theory, a model, and a case study, Journal of Systems and Software, pp.157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.083 [3] Jez Humble and David Farley, 2010. Continuous Delivery: Reliable Software Releases Through Build, Test, and Deployment Automation. [4] ISO - ISO/IEC/IEEE 12207:2017 - Systems and software engineering — Software life cycle processes: https://www.iso.org/standard/63712.html, Accessed on 07/05/2021. [5] Mary Poppendieck and Tom Poppendieck, 2003. Lean Software Development: An Agile Toolkit, Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston, USA. [6] Len Bass and Ingo Weber, Liming Zhu, 2015. DevOps: A Software Architect's Perspective, Addison Wesley, US. [7] Krikor Maroukian and Stephen Gulliver, 2020. Leading DevOps practice and principle adoption. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Information Technology Convergence and Services (ITCSE’20). 10, 5, AIRCC, Computer Science and Information Technology, 41-56. 14 [8] Wouter J.W. Geurts, 2016. Faster is Better and Cheaper, Wiley Online, vol. 26, pp. 1002-1015, Jul. 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2016.00207.x. [9] Senapathi Mali, Jim Buchan and H. Osman, 2018. DevOps Capabilities, Practices, and Challenges: Insights from a Case Study. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering 2018. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3210459.3210465. [10] Robin Bolscher and Maya Daneva. 2019. Designing Software Architecture to Support Continuous Delivery and DevOps: A Systematic Literature Review, In Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Software Technologies (ICSOFT 2019), Prague, Czech Republic. DOI: 10.5220/0007837000270039. [11] Lucy Ellen Lwakatare, Pasi Kuvaja and Markku Oivo. 2016. An exploratory study of DevOps: extending the dimensions of DevOps with practices, In Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Software Engineering Advances, pp. 91–99, IARIA, Rome. [12] Martin Kropp, Andreas Meier, Craig Anslow and Robert Biddle. 2018. Satisfaction, Practices, and Influences in Agile Software Development, In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE), Association for Computing Machinery, USA, pp112–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3210459.3210470. [13] Anna Wiedemann and Manuel Wiesche. 2018. Are You Ready for DevOps? Required Skill Set for DevOps Teams, In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Portsmouth. [14] Themba Masombuka, Ernest Mnkandla. 2018. A DevOps collaboration culture acceptance model, In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists (SAICSIT), Association for Computing Machinery, USA, pp279–285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3278681.3278714. [15] Breno B. Nicolau de França, Helvio Jeronimo and Guilherme Horta Travassos. 2016. Characterizing DevOps by hearing multiple voices, In Proceedings of the 30th Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering (SBES), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, pp. 53–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2973839.2973845. [16] Mary Sánchez-Gordón and Ricardo Colomo-Palacios. 2018. Characterizing DevOps Culture: A Systematic Literature Review, Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination (SPICE), Communications in Computer and Information Science, Vol.918, Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00623-5_1. [17] M Rajkumar, Anil Kumar Pole, Vittalraya Shenoy Adige and Prabal Mahanta. 2016. DevOps culture and its impact on cloud delivery and software development, In Proceedings International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication, & Automation (ICACCA), pp1-6. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1109/ICACCA.2016.7578902. [18] Pilar Rodríguez, Ali reza Haghighatkhaha, Lucy Ellen Lwakatare, Susanna Teppola, Tanja Suomalainen, Juho Eskeli, Teemu Karvonen, Pasi Kuvaja, June M.Verner, Markku Oivo. 2017. Continuous deployment of software intensive products and services: A systematic mapping study, Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 123, pp. 263-291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.12.015. [19] GitHub Adidas DevOps Maturity Framework. Retrieved June 4, 2021 from https://github.com/adidas/adidas-devops-maturity-framework [20] Bernard M. Bass. 1998. Transformational Leadership: Industrial, Military, and Educational Impact. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [21] Gary A. Yukl. 2020. Leadership in organizations, Pearson Education, Essex, ISBN13:978-1-292-31440-2. [22] Nathan Eva, Mulyadi Robin, Sen Sendjaya, Dirk van Dierendonck and Robert C.Liden. 2019. Servant Leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30, 1, 111-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004. [23] Krikor Maroukian and Stephen Gulliver. 2020. The Link Between Transformational and Servant Leadership in DevOps-Oriented Organizations. In Proceedings of the 2020 European Symposium on Software Engineering (ESSE 2020). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 21–29. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3393822.3432340. [24] Puppet, DORA. State of DevOps Report 2020. Retrieved June 4, 2021 from https://puppet.com/resources/report/2020-state-of-devops-report/ [25] Mark Saunders, Philip Lewis and Adrian Thornhill. 2018. Research Methods for Business Students, 8th Edition. [26] Judith Green and Nicki Thorogood. 2009. Qualitative methods for health research. Sage, London. [27] Yukl, G.A., Gardner, III, W.L., 2020. Leadership in organizations. Pearson Education. Essex. ISBN13:978-1-292-31440-2. [28] Jyrki Kontio, Laura Lehtola and Johanna Bragge, 2004. Using the Focus Group Method in Software Engineering: Obtaining Practitioner and User Experiences. In Proceedings of the 2004 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE '04). IEEE Computer Society, USA, 271–280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISESE.2004.1334914. [29] David L. Morgan. 2003. Focus groups. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 22 (1), 129–152. [30] Joe Langford and Deana McDonaugh, 2003. Focus Groups. Supporting Effective Product Development, Taylor and Francis. [31] European Commission definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises. Retrieved June 4, 2021 from https://ec.europa.eu/growth/smes/sme-definition_en [32] Joseph F. Hair, Jeffrey J. Risher, Marko Sarstedt, Christian M. Ringle. 2018. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eurpean Business Review, Vol. 31:1. [33] Joseph F. Hair, G. Tomas M. Hult, Christian M. Ringle, Marko Sarstedt, 2014. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). 2nd ed. SAGE Publications. [34] Burke Johnson, Larry Christensen,. 2008. Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. 3rd Edition, Sage Publications, Inc., Lose Angeles. 15 [35] Anol Bhattacherjee. 2001. Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model. MIS Quarterly. 25, 351-370. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3250921

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

University of Reading

CentAUR: Central Archive at the University of Reading

Accessibility navigation

Synthesis of a leadership model for DevOps adoption

Abstract/Summary

Page navigation

See also

Footer navigation