Working memory and working attention: What could possibly evolve?
Beaman, C. P. (2010) Working memory and working attention: What could possibly evolve? Current Anthropology, 51 (S1). S27-S38. ISSN 0011-3204
To link to this item DOI: 10.1086/650297
The concept of “working” memory is traceable back to nineteenth century theorists (Baldwin, 1894; James 1890) but the term itself was not used until the mid-twentieth century (Miller, Galanter & Pribram, 1960). A variety of different explanatory constructs have since evolved which all make use of the working memory label (Miyake & Shah, 1999). This history is briefly reviewed and alternative formulations of working memory (as language-processor, executive attention, and global workspace) are considered as potential mechanisms for cognitive change within and between individuals and between species. A means, derived from the literature on human problem-solving (Newell & Simon, 1972), of tracing memory and computational demands across a single task is described and applied to two specific examples of tool-use by chimpanzees and early hominids. The examples show how specific proposals for necessary and/or sufficient computational and memory requirements can be more rigorously assessed on a task by task basis. General difficulties in connecting cognitive theories (arising from the observed capabilities of individuals deprived of material support) with archaeological data (primarily remnants of material culture) are discussed.
• Altmann, E. 2002. Functional decay of memory for tasks. Psychological Research 66: 287-297. • Altmann, E and G. Trafton, 2002. Memory for goals: An activation-based model. Cognitive Science 26: 39-83. • Anderson, J. R. 2007. How can the human mind occur in the physical universe? Oxford: Oxford University Press. • Anderson, J. R. 2005. Human symbol manipulation within an integrated cognitive architecture. Cognitive Science, 29: 313-342. • Anderson, J. R., D. Bothell, M. Byrne, S. Douglass, C. Lebiere and Y. Qin. 2004. An integrated theory of mind. Psychological Review 111: 1036-1060. • Anderson, J. R., N. Kushmerick and C. Lebiere. 1993. Navigation and conflict resolution. In Rules of the mind. J. R. Anderson ed. Pp. 93-120. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum. • Anderson, J. R., and C. Lebiere. 2003. The Newell test for a theory of mind. Behavioral & Brain Sciences 26: 587-640. • Anderson, M. 1992. Intelligence and development. Oxford: Blackwell. • Baddeley, A. D. 1986. Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. • Baddeley, A. D. 2000. The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4: 417-423. • Baddeley, A. D. 2003. Short-term phonological memory and long-term learning: A single case study. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5: 129-148. • Baddeley, A. D. 2007. Working memory, thought and action. Oxford: Oxford University Press. • Baddeley, A. D., S. Gathercole and C. Papagno. 1998. The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review 105: 158-173 • Baddeley, A. D, and G. Hitch. 1974. Working memory. In: The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory. G. H. Bower ed. Pp. 47-90. New York: Academic Press. • Baldwin, J. 1894 Mental development in the child and the race. New York: Macmillan. • Barnard, P., D. Duke, R. Byrne and I. Davidson. 2007. Differentiation in cognitive and emotional meanings: An evolutionary analysis. Cognition & Emotion. 5: 1-39. • Beaman, C. P. 2004. The irrelevant sound phenomenon revisited: What role for working memory capacity? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 30: 1106-118. • Beaman, C. P. 2007. Does the working memory account of Neandertal cognition work? Journal of Human Evolution 52: 702-706. • Borsboom, D., and C. V. Dolan. 2006. Why g is not an adaptation: A comment on Kanazawa (2004). Psychological Review, 113: 433-437. • Brooks, R. A. 1991. Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47: 139-159. • Bruner, E. 2004. Geometric morphometrics and paleoneurology: Brain shape evolution in the genus Homo. Journal of Human Evolution, 47: 279-303. • Buchsbaum, B. R., and M. D’Esposito. 2008. The search for the phonological store: From loop to convolution. Cognitive Neuroscience, 20: 762-778. • Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton. • Chomsky, N. 1959. Review of Verbal behavior by B. F. Skinner. Language. 35: 26-58. • Conway, A. R. A., M. Kane, M. Bunting, Z. Hambrick, O. Wilhelm and R. W. Engle. 2005. Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 12: 769-786. • Conway, A. R. A., M. Kane and R. W. Engle. 2003. Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7, 547-552. • Coolidge, Frederick, and Thomas Wynn. 2001. Executive functions of the frontal lobes and the evolutionary ascendancy of Homo Sapiens. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 11: 255-260. • Coolidge, F., and T. Wynn. 2004. A cognitive and neuropsychological perspective on the Châtelperronian. Journal of Anthropological Research. 60: 55-73. • Coolidge, F., and T. Wynn. 2007. The working memory account of Neandertal cognition – how phonological storage capacity may be related to recursion and the pragmatics of modern speech. Journal of Human Evolution. 52: 707-710. • Cooper, R. P. 2002. Modelling high-level cognitive processes. Mahwah, N. J.: Erlbaum. • Cooper, R. P., Fox, J., Farringdon, J., and Shallice, T. 1996. A systematic methodology for cognitive modelling. Artificial Intelligence. 85: 3-44. • Corballis, M. 2007. Recursion, language and starlings. Cognitive Science. 31: 697-704. • Cowan, N. 2001 The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral & Brain Sciences 24: 87-185, • Cowan, N. 2005 Working memory capacity. Hillsdale, N. J.: Psychology Press. • Cowan, N., C. C. Morey and Z. Chen. (2007). The legend of the magical number seven. In: S. Della Sala ed. pp. 45-59. Tall tales about the mind & brain: Separating fact from fiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press • d’ Errico, F. 1998. Paleolithic origins of artificial memory systems: An evolutionary perspective. In: Cognition and material culture: the archaeology of symbolic storage. C. Renfrew and C. Scarre ed.s. Pp. 19-50. Cambridge: MacDonald Institute. • d’ Errico, F. 2001. Memories out of mind: The archaeology of the oldest memory systems. In: In the mind’s eye: Multidisciplinary approaches to the evolution of human cognition, A. Nowell ed., Pp. 34-49. Ann Arbor: International Monographs in Prehistory. • Donald, M. 1991. Origins of the modern mind. Cambridge Ma.: Harvard University Press. • Fitch, T, and M. Hauser. 2004. Computational constraints on syntactic processing in a nonhuman primate. Science. 303: 377-380 • Fitch, T.., M. Hauser and N. Chomsky. 2005. The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications. Cognition. 97: 179-210. • Gathercole, S. 2006. Nonword repetition and word learning: The nature of the relationship. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27: 513-543. • Gentner, T., K. Fenn, D. Margoliash and H. Nusbaum. 2006. Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds, Nature, 440: 1204-1207. • Goel, V., D. Pullara, and J. Grafman. 2001. A computational model of frontal lobe dysfunction: Working memory and the Tower of Hanoi task. Cognitive Science 25: 287-313. • Goldman-Rakic, P. 1992. Working memory and the mind. Scientific American, 267: 110-117. • Grill-Spector, K., and N. Kanwisher. 2005. Visual Recognition: As soon as you know it is there, you know what it is. Psychological Science, 16: 152-160 • Hambrick, D., and R. W. Engle. 2002. Effects of domain knowledge, working memory capacity and age on cognitive performance: An investigation of the knowledge-is-power hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, 44: 339-387. • Hauser, M., N. Chomsky and T. Fitch. 2002. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298: 1569-1579. • Hazy, T. E., M. J. Frank and R. C. O’Reilly. 2007. Towards an executive without a homunculus: Computational models of the prefrontal cortex/basal ganglia system. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 362: 1601- 1613. • Henshilwood, C. S., and C. W. Marean. 2003. The origin of modern human behavior: Critique of the models and their test implications. Current Anthropology, 44: 627-651. • Innoue, S., and Te. Matsuzawa. 2007. Working memory of numerals in chimpanzees. Current Biology 17: R1004-R1005. • Jacquemot, C. and S. K. Scott. 2006. What is the relationship between phonological short-term memory and speech processing? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10: 480-486. • James, W. 1890. Principles of psychology. New York: Holt. • Jeffries, R., P. Polson, L. Razran and M. Atwood. 1977. A process model for missionaries-cannibals and other river-crossing problems. Cognitive Psychology 9: 412-440. • Jones, D. M., W. J. Macken and A. P. Nicholls. 2004. The phonological loop of working memory: is it phonological and is it a store? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 30: 656-674. • Kane, M. J., A. R. A. Conway, D. Hambrick and R. W. Engle. 2007. Variation in working memory capacity as variation in executive attention and control. In: Variation in working memory. A. R. A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. J. Kane, A. Miyake and J. Towse ed.s. Pp. 21-48. Oxford: Oxford University Press. • Kane, M. J., and R. W. Engle. 2002. The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention and general fluid intelligence: An individual differences perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9: 637-671. • Kotovsky, K., J. R. Hayes, and H. A. Simon. 1984. Why are some problems hard? Evidence from the Tower of Hanoi. Cognitive Psychology 17: 248-294. • Kutas, M., and K. Federmeier. 2000. Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4: 463-470. • Lewis, R., and S. Vasishth. 2005. An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval. Cognitive Science 29: 375-419. • Lewis, R., S. Shravan Vasishth, and J. Van Dyke. 2006. Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10: 447-454. • MacGregor, J., T. Ormerod and E. Chronicle. 2001. Information processing and insight: A process model of performance on the nine-dot and related problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 27: 176-201. • Marshak, A. 1972. Cognitive aspects of Upper Paleolithic engraving. Current Anthropology, 13: 445-477. • Marshak, A. 1991. The Tai Plaque and calendrical notation in the Upper Paleolithic. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 1: 25-61. • Marslen-Wilson, W. D. 1987. Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition 25: 71-102 • McNab, F. and T. Klingberg. 2007. Prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia control access to working memory. Nature Neuroscience 11: 103-107. • Miller, G. 2000. The mating mind: How sexual selection shaped the evolution of human nature. London: Heinemann • Miller, George. 1956. The magic number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 63: 81-93. • Miller, George, E. Galanter and K. Pribram. 1960 Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. • Mithen, S. 1990. Thoughtful foragers: A study in prehistoric decision-making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. • Mithen, S. 1996. The prehistory of the mind. London: Thames & Hudson. • Miyake, A, and P. Shah. 1999. Models of working memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. • Montague, R. 2006. Why choose this book? New York: Dutton. • Moss, H., S. McCormick and L. Tyler. 1997. The time course of activation of semantic information during spoken word recognition. Language & Cognitive Processes, 12: 695-731. • Murofushi, K. 1997. Numerical matching behavior by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): Subitizing and analogue magnitude estimation. Japanese Psychological Research, 39: 140-153. • Neath, I. 2000. Is “working memory” still a useful concept? Contemporary Psychology, 45:410-412. • Newell, A. 1990. Unified theories of cognition. Harvard: Harvard University Press. • Newell, A. and H. Simon. 1972. Human problem-solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. • Nowak, M., N. Komarova and P. Niyogi. 2002. Computational and evolutionary aspects of language. Nature, 417: 611-617. • Papineau, D. 2001. The evolution of means-end reasoning. In: Naturalism, evolution and mind. D. Walsh ed. Pp. 145-178. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. • Rabbitt, P. 1997. Methodology of frontal and executive function. Hove, UK: Psychology Press. • Rabbitt, P. 2001. Review essay “How strange are the tricks of memory”. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 54A: 1261-1264. • Reisberg, D., I. Rappaport, and M. O’Shaughness. 1984. Limits of working memory: The digit digit-span. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 10: 203-221. • Renfrew, C. and C. Scarre. 1998. Cognition and material culture: the archaeology of symbolic storage. Cambridge: MacDonald Institute • Simon, H. A. 1992. What is an “explanation” of behavior? Psychological Science. 3: 150-161. • Stout, D., N. Toth, K. Schick, and T. Chaminade. 2008. Neural correlates of Early Stone Age toolmaking: Technology, language and cognition in human evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363: 1939-1949. • Tuholski, S., R. W. Engle and G. Baylis. 2001. Individual differences in working memory capacity and enumeration. Memory & Cognition 29: 484-492. • Turing, A.. 1936. On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsoroblem. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 2nd Series, 42: 230-265. • Yip, M. 2006. The search for phonology in other species. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10: 442-446.