The neural processing of masked speech: Evidence for different mechanisms in the left and right temporal lobes
Scott, S. K., Rosen, S., Beaman, C. P., Davis, J. P. and Wise, R. J. S. (2009) The neural processing of masked speech: Evidence for different mechanisms in the left and right temporal lobes. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125 (3). pp. 1737-1743. ISSN 0001-4966
Full text not archived in this repository.
To link to this item DOI: 10.1121/1.3050255
It has been previously demonstrated that extensive activation in the dorsolateral temporal lobes associated with masking a speech target with a speech masker, consistent with the hypothesis that competition for central auditory processes is an important factor in informational masking. Here, masking from speech and two additional maskers derived from the original speech were investigated. One of these is spectrally rotated speech, which is unintelligible and has a similar (inverted) spectrotemporal profile to speech. The authors also controlled for the possibility of “glimpsing” of the target signal during modulated masking sounds by using speech-modulated noise as a masker in a baseline condition. Functional imaging results reveal that masking speech with speech leads to bilateral superior temporal gyrus (STG) activation relative to a speech-in-noise baseline, while masking speech with spectrally rotated speech leads solely to right STG activation relative to the baseline. This result is discussed in terms of hemispheric asymmetries for speech perception, and interpreted as showing that masking effects can arise through two parallel neural systems, in the left and right temporal lobes. This has implications for the competition for resources caused by speech and rotated speech maskers, and may illuminate some of the mechanisms involved in informational masking.
• Blesser, B. _1972_. “Speech perception under conditions of spectral transformation: Phonetic characteristics,” J. Speech Hear. Res. 15, 5–41. • Brechmann, A., and Scheich, H. _2005_. “Hemispheric shifts of sound representation in auditory cortex with conceptual listening,” Cereb. Cortex 15, 578–587. • Brungart, D. S. _2001_. “Informational and energetic masking effect in the perception of two simultaneous talkers,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 1101– 1109. • Byrne, D., Dillon, H., Tran, K., Arlinger, S., Wilbraham, K., Cox, R. H. B., Hetu, R. K. J., Liu, C., Kiessling, J., Kotby, M. N., Nasser, N. H. A., Elkholy, W. A. H., Nakanishi, Y. O. H., Powell, R., Stephens, D., Merdedith, R., Sirimanna, T., Tavartkiladze, G. F., Westerman, S., and Ludvigsen, C. _1994_. “An international comparison of long-term average speech spectra,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96, 2108–2120. • Festen, J., and Plomp, R. _1990_. “Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 1725–1736. • Foster, J. R., Summerfield, A. Q., Marshall, D. H., Palmer, L., Ball, V., and • Rosen, S. _1993_. “Lip-reading the BKB sentence lists—Corrections for list and practice effects,” Br. J. Audiol. 27, 233–246. • Hawley, M. L., Litovsky, R. Y., and Culling, J. F. _2004_. “The benefit of binaural hearing in a cocktail party: Effect of location and type of interferer,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 833–843. • Huckvale, M. _2007_. “Speech filing system _software package_,” http:// www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/resource/sfs/ _Last viewed May, 2008_. • Jacquemot, C., Pallier, C., LeBihan, D., Dehaene, S., and Dupoux, E. _2003_. “Phonological grammar shapes the auditory cortex: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study,” J. Neurosci. 23, 9541–9546. • Johnstone, P. M., and Litovsky, R. Y. _2006_. “Effect of masker type and age on speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking in children and adults,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 2177–2189. • MacLeod, A., and Summerfield, Q. _1987_. “Quantifying the contribution of vision to speech perception in noise,” Br. J. Audiol. 21, 131–141. • Mummery, C. J., Ashburner, J., Scott, S. K., and Wise, R. J. S. _1999_. “Functional neuroimaging of speech perception in six normal and two aphasic patients,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 449–457. • Narain, C., Scott, S. K., Wise, R. J. S., Rosen, S., Leff, A. P., Iversen, S. D., and Matthews, P. M. _2003_. “Defining a left-lateralized response specific to intelligible speech using fMRI,” Cereb. Cortex 13, 1362–1368. • Patterson, R. D., Uppenkamp, S., Johnsrude, I. S., and Griffiths, T. D. _2002_. “The processing of temporal pitch and melody information in auditory cortex,” Neuron 36, 767–776. • Rhebergen, K. S., Versfeld, N. J., and Dreschler, W. A. _2005_. “Release from informational masking by time reversal of native and non-native interfering speech,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 1274–1277. • Roucus, S., and Wilgus, A. W. _1985_. “High quality time-scale modification for speech,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference of Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pp. 493–496. • Scott, S. K., Rosen, S., Lang, H., and Wise, R. J. S. _2006_. “Neural correlates of intelligibility in speech investigated with noise vocoded speech: A positron emission tomography study,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 1075– 1083. • Scott, S. K. _2005_. “Auditory processing–speech, space and auditory objects,” Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 15, 197–201. • Scott, S. K., Blank, S. C., Rosen, S., and Wise, R. J. S. _2000_. “Identification of a pathway for intelligible speech in the left temporal lobe,” Brain 123, 2400–2406. • Scott, S. K., and Johnsrude, I. S. _2003_. “The neuroanatomical and functional organization of speech perception,” Trends Neurosci. 26, 100–107. • Scott, S. K., Rosen, S., Wickham, L., and Wise, R. J. S. _2004_. “A positron emission tomography study of the neural basis of informational and energetic masking effects in speech perception,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 813–821. • Scott, S. K., and Wise, R. J. S. _2003_. “Functional imaging and language: A critical guide to methodology and analysis,” Speech Commun. 41, 7–21. • Scott, S. K., and Wise, R. J. S. _2004_. “The functional neuroanatomy of prelexical processing of speech,” Cognition 92, 13–45. • Wise, R. J. S., Scott, S. K., Blank, S. C., Mummery, C. J., and Warburton, E. _2001_. “Identifying separate neural sub-systems within ‘Wernicke’s area,’” Brain 124, 83–95. • Zatorre, R. J., and Belin, P. _2001_. “Spectral and temporal processing in human auditory cortex,” Cereb. Cortex 11, 946–953. • Zatorre, R. J., Bouffard, M., and Belin, P. _2004_. “Sensitivity to auditory object features in human temporal neocortex,” J. Neurosci. 24, 3637– 3642.