Rugman, A. M. (2010) Reconciling internalization theory and the eclectic paradigm. Multinational Business Review, 18 (2). pp. 1-12. ISSN 1525-383X doi: 10.1108/1525383X201000007
Abstract/Summary
The eclectic paradigm of Dunning (1980) (with its OLI and four motives for FDI framework) can be reconciled with the firm and country matrix of Rugman (1981). However, the fit is not perfect. The main reason for misalignment is that Dunning is focused upon outward FDI into host economies, whereas Rugman’s matrix is for firm-level strategy covering MNE activity in both home and host countries.
Altmetric Badge
| Item Type | Article |
| URI | https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/6112 |
| Identification Number/DOI | 10.1108/1525383X201000007 |
| Refereed | Yes |
| Divisions | Henley Business School > International Business and Strategy |
| Uncontrolled Keywords | internalization theory, Dunning’s eclectic paradigm, firm-specific advantages, country specific advantages, multinational enterprises. Introduction |
| Publisher | Boeing Institute of International Business at Saint Louis University |
| Download/View statistics | View download statistics for this item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record
Download
Download