Reconciling internalization theory and the eclectic paradigm

[thumbnail of MBR_18_2_-1_FINAL.pdf]
Preview
Text
- Published Version

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Rugman, A. M. (2010) Reconciling internalization theory and the eclectic paradigm. Multinational Business Review, 18 (2). pp. 1-12. ISSN 1525-383X doi: 10.1108/1525383X201000007

Abstract/Summary

The eclectic paradigm of Dunning (1980) (with its OLI and four motives for FDI framework) can be reconciled with the firm and country matrix of Rugman (1981). However, the fit is not perfect. The main reason for misalignment is that Dunning is focused upon outward FDI into host economies, whereas Rugman’s matrix is for firm-level strategy covering MNE activity in both home and host countries.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/6112
Identification Number/DOI 10.1108/1525383X201000007
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > International Business and Strategy
Uncontrolled Keywords internalization theory, Dunning’s eclectic paradigm, firm-specific advantages, country specific advantages, multinational enterprises. Introduction
Publisher Boeing Institute of International Business at Saint Louis University
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record