Accessibility navigation


The IB/ IHRM interface: exploring the potential of intersectional theorizing

Andersson, U., Brewster, C. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5314-1518, Minbaeva, D., Narula, R. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4266-2681 and Wood, G. (2019) The IB/ IHRM interface: exploring the potential of intersectional theorizing. Journal of World Business, 54 (5). 1009988. ISSN 1090-9516

[img]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.

631kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1016/j.jwb.2019.100998

Abstract/Summary

Although the core concepts underlying IB and IHRM provide a common lexicon and epistemology, this commonality is often more implicit than explicit. We highlight not only the common ground but also the lack of critical dialogue between the two fields. This paper asks: What can each field learn from the other? What do scholars from IB learn from IHRM and vice versa? We identify a possible agenda and concerns regarding theory building as a basis for dialogue between the two fields.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Henley Business School > International Business and Strategy
ID Code:84114
Publisher:Elsevier

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation