Accessibility navigation


Why does Arakawa and Schubert's convective quasi-equilibrium closure not work? Mathematical analysis and implications

Yano, J.-I. and Plant, B. (2020) Why does Arakawa and Schubert's convective quasi-equilibrium closure not work? Mathematical analysis and implications. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 77 (4). pp. 1371-1385. ISSN 1520-0469

[img]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.

567kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1175/jas-d-19-0165.1

Abstract/Summary

Arakawa and Schubert (1974) proposed convective quasi-equilibrium as a guiding principle for the closure of convection parameterization. However, empirical experiences from operational implementation efforts suggest that its strict application does not work well. The purpose of the present paper is to explain mathematically why this closure does not work in practice, and to suggest that problems stem from physically unrealistic assumptions. For this purpose, the closure hypothesis is examined in its original form, and without imposing a condition of a positiveness to the convective mass fluxes. The Jordan sounding with idealized large-scale forcing is used for diagnosis purposes. The question is addressed from several perspectives including the completeness of the entraining plume spectrum, and a singular vector decomposition of the interaction kernel matrix. The main problems with the quasi–equilibrium closure are traced to: (i) the relatively slow response of shallower convective modes to large-scale forcing; and, (ii) detrainment at convection top producing strong cooling and moistening. A strict application of the convective quasi-equilibrium principle leads to a singular response of shallow convection. An explicit coupling of convection with stratiform clouds would be crucial for preventing this unrealistic behavior, recognizing that the re-evaporation of detrained cloudy-air is a relatively slow process.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Faculty of Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Meteorology
ID Code:87845
Publisher:American Meteorological Society

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation