Accessibility navigation


Managing dissociation in imagery rescripting for voice hearers with trauma: lessons from a case series

Paulik, G., Newman Taylor, K., Steel, C. and Arntz, A. (2020) Managing dissociation in imagery rescripting for voice hearers with trauma: lessons from a case series. Cognitive and Behavioural Practice. ISSN 1077-7229 (In Press)

[img] Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

287kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Abstract/Summary

Trauma, voice hearing and dissociation tend to be closely linked. Cognitive models of voice hearing largely agree that traumatic events may predispose people to voice hearing via dissociative processes. While treating trauma in voice hearers may help to reduce voice distress and frequency, dissociation may be a barrier to this therapeutic work. This case series reports on the dissociative experiences of a sub-sample of voice hearing clients who reported dissociation during Imagery Rescripting (ImRs) for trauma (N=6, 50% of original sample) in the case series study reported on previously (Paulik, Steel & Arntz, 2019). The aims in the current paper were to explore the impact of dissociation on outcomes, the type of dissociative experiences encountered, where in the ImRs protocol they occurred, and the use of therapeutic techniques to address them. We found that clients who dissociated during therapy showed reductions in their trauma intrusions and voice-related distress and frequency. However, when compared to non-dissociators, these benefits took more sessions to achieve. The most common types of dissociation were flashbacks, losing control over the image, emotional detachment and trance/absorbed state. These were most likely to occur at points during the therapy where negative affect was heightened. Grounding and soothing techniques, as well as strategies to reduce the level of negative affect were reported effective by participants in preventing or interrupting dissociation. We recommend that dissociation should not be a barrier to implementing imagery rescripting with this group.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Faculty of Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Psychology
ID Code:91868
Publisher:Elsevier

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation