Accessibility navigation


Capitals, occupational fields, and consumption preferences: an analysis of the British family expenditure survey (2009-2016)

Pavlisa, K. and Scott, P. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1230-9040 (2022) Capitals, occupational fields, and consumption preferences: an analysis of the British family expenditure survey (2009-2016). The Sociological Review. ISSN 0038-0261 (In Press)

[img] Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.

624kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Abstract/Summary

Relationships between occupational membership and personal consumption have long been an important area of social analysis. Occupational groups represent important contexts of consumption, where individuals’ advantages and resources are accumulated and often impose reproduction of field-specific practices and patterns of behaviour. Drawing on Bourdieu’s conceptualisation of capitals and using the British Family Expenditure survey, we explore consumption of capital-signalling goods across particular occupational groups within the professional-managerial ‘class’, associated with different capital structures, and demonstrate distinct spending strategies geared to the pursuit of occupational advancement. We examine consumption behaviours for six managerial/professional groups - business professionals; technical professionals; educational professionals; higher, and lower, private sector management; and public sector management. We test whether distinctive patterns of ‘capital-signalling’ consumption can be identified and find significant effects of capital composition on presentational, socialization-related, and informational expenditure, consistent with our hypotheses. We argue that consumption is a part of the signalling strategy of career agents, and between-occupational contrasts in capital-signalling expenditures are important but overlooked measures of capitals in cultural class analysis. We conclude that granular analysis of consumption patterns is important for revealing differences in accumulation of non-economic capitals across occupational groups, with significant implications for understanding inequality and class divisions.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Henley Business School > International Business and Strategy
ID Code:104705
Publisher:Sage

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation