Now you see it, now you don’t: relevance of threat enhances social anxiety-linked attentional bias to angry faces, but relevance of neutral information attenuates itVogt, J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3178-2805, Dodd, H. F. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1446-5338, Parker, A., Duffield, F. and Sakaki, M. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1993-5765 (2022) Now you see it, now you don’t: relevance of threat enhances social anxiety-linked attentional bias to angry faces, but relevance of neutral information attenuates it. PLoS ONE, 17 (7). e0271752. ISSN 1932-6203
It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing. To link to this item DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271752 Abstract/SummaryTemporary goals modulate attention to threat. We examined whether attentional bias to angry faces differs depending on whether a temporary background goal is neutral, or threat related, whilst also measuring social anxiety. Participants performed a dot probe task combined with a separate task that induced a temporary goal. Depending on the phase in this goal task, the goal made angry faces or neutral stimuli (i.e., houses) relevant. The dot probe task measured attention to combinations of angry faces, neutral but goal-relevant stimuli (i.e., houses), and neutral control stimuli. Attention was allocated to angry faces when an angry goal was active. This was more pronounced for people scoring high on social phobia. The neutral goal attenuated attention to angry faces and effects of social phobia were no longer apparent. These findings suggest that individual differences in social anxiety interact with current and temporary goals to affect attentional processes.
Download Statistics DownloadsDownloads per month over past year Altmetric Deposit Details University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record |