Accessibility navigation

Testing factor models in the cross-section

Hollstein, F. and Prokopczuk, M. (2022) Testing factor models in the cross-section. Journal of Banking and Finance, 145. 106626. ISSN 0378-4266

Text - Accepted Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.


It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106626


The standard full-sample time-series asset pricing test suffers from poor statistical properties, look-ahead bias, constant-beta assumptions, and rejects models when average factor returns deviate from risk premia. We therefore confront prominent equity pricing models with the classical Fama and MacBeth (1973) cross-sectional test. For all models, we uncover three main findings: (i) the intercept coefficients are economically large and highly statistically significant; (ii) cross-sectional factor risk premium estimates are generally far below the average factor excess returns; and (iii) they are usually not statistically significant. Overall, all new factor models are inconsistent with no-arbitrage pricing and cannot accurately explain the cross-section of stock returns.

Item Type:Article
Divisions:Henley Business School > ICMA Centre
ID Code:107905


Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation