Dynamic tests as a language-free method for assessing reading in a multilingual setting

Lists

Tools

Pye, R. E. and Chan, H. H. (2023) Dynamic tests as a language-free method for assessing reading in a multilingual setting. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science, 7 (2). pp. 147-158. ISSN 2520-1018

	Text (Open Access) - Published Version · Restricted to Repository staff only · The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability. · Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 254kB
	Text - Accepted Version · Restricted to Repository staff only · The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability. 414kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1007/s41809-023-00120-8

Abstract/Summary

It is difficult to assess reading ability or diagnose dyslexia in Malaysia due to its complex linguistic background of simultaneous multilingualism and multiliteracy. Low scores on traditional reading tests could be explained by language and contextual factors rather than indicating reading difficulty. One method shown to be less sensitive to specific language factors is the Dynamic Testing paradigm (Elbro et al., 2012). Fifty-nine Malaysian adult readers of English and Bahasa Melayu and/or Chinese were recruited and their performances on the dynamic test assessed. Scores on the Dynamic Test significantly predicted potential reading difficulty as measured by the Adult Reading History Questionnaire (Lefly & Pennington, 2000) but not reading proficiency measured by a Lexical Decision Task (LDT). Participants were then grouped by language of first literacy: alphabetic (English and Bahasa Melayu) or morphosyllabic (Chinese). No significant differences were found between those reading morphosyllabic versus alphabetic orthographies for the Dynamic Test. The Dynamic Test was a significant predictor of potential reading difficulty in the alphabetic group only. Thus, it was concluded that the dynamic format could be a suitable assessment tool for multilinguals, but that further research is required to determine its utility, especially in non-alphabetic languages.

Item Type:	Article
Refereed:	Yes
Divisions:	Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Psychology University of Reading Malaysia
ID Code:	111330
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Dynamic testing; multilingual; reading difficulty; morphosyllabic; multiliteracy; alphabetic;
Publisher:	Springer Nature

Altmetric

Deposit Details

References

References Aaron, P. G., Joshi, R.M., Boulware-Gooden, R., & Bentum, K. (2008). Diagnosis and treatment of reading disabilities based on the Component Model of Reading: An alternative to the discrepancy model of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 67–84. https:// /doi.org/10.1177/0022219407310838 Anderson, J. A., Mak, L., Chahi, A. K., & Bialystok, E. (2018). The language and social background questionnaire: Assessing degree of bilingualism in a diverse population. Behavior Research Methods, 50(1), 250-263. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0867-9 Aravena, S., Snellings, P., Tijms, J., & van der Molen, M. W. (2013). A lab-controlled simulation of a letter–speech sound binding deficit in dyslexia. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115(4), 691-707. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JECP.2013.03.009 Aravena, S., Tijms, J., Snellings, P., & van der Molen, M. W. (2016). Predicting responsiveness to intervention in dyslexia using dynamic assessment. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 209-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.06.024 Aravena, S., Tijms, J., Snellings, P., & van der Molen, M. W. (2018). Predicting individual differences in reading and spelling skill with artificial script–based letter–speech sound training. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(6), 552-564. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219417715407 Cambridge University Press (n.d.). Cambridge Dictionary. Accessed October 22nd 2018 from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/ Chikamatsu, N. (1996). The effects of L1 orthography on L2 word recognition: A study of American and Chinese learners of Japanese. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(4), 403-432. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100015369 Daniels, P.T. & Share, D.L. (2018). Writing system variation and its consequences for reading and dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(1), 101-116. https://doi.org/10.1080.10888438.2017.1379082 Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2020). Current Population Estimates, Malaysia. Retrieved July 25 2020, from https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php?r=column/cthemeByCat&cat=155&bul_id=OVByWjg5YkQ3MWFZRTN5bDJiaEVhZz09&menu_id=L0pheU43NWJwRWVSZklWdzQ4TlhUUT09 Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka (n.d.). Kamus Dewan. Retrieved October 22nd 2018 from http://prpm.dbp.gov.my/ Dzalani, H., & Shamsuddin, K. (2014). A Review of Definitions and Identifications of Specific Learning Disabilities in Malaysia and Challenges in Provision of Services. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 22(1). http://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/pjssh/browse/regular-issue?article=JSSH-0620-2012 Elbro, C., Daugaard, H. T., & Gellert, A. S. (2012). Dyslexia in a second language?—a dynamic test of reading acquisition may provide a fair answer. Annals of Dyslexia, 62(3), 172-185. https:// /doi.org/10.1007/s11881-012-0071-7 Elbeheri, G., & Everatt, J. (2016). Principles and guidelines in test construction for multilingual children. In L Peer and G Reid (Eds.), Multilingualism, Literacy and Dyslexia (pp. 49-60). Routledge. Gomez, C. (2004). Dyslexia in Malaysia. By I. Smythe, J. Everatt & R. Salter (Eds.) International book of dyslexia: A guide to practice and resources (pp158-163). John Wiley & Sons. Gullifer, J.W. & Titone, D. (2020). Characterizing the social diversity of bilingualism using language entropy. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23, 283-294. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728919000026 Horbach, J., Scharke, W., Cröll, J., Heim, S., and Günther, T. (2015). Kindergarteners’ performance in a sound-symbol paradigm predicts early reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 139, 256–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.06.007 Horbach, J., Weber, K., Opolony, F., Scharke, W., Radach, R., Heim, S., & Günther, T. (2018). Performance in Sound-Symbol Learning Predicts Reading Performance 3 Years Later. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1716. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01716 Jalil, S.B. & Liow, S.J.R. (2008). How does home language influence early spellings? Phonologically plausible errors of diglossic Malay children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29 (4), 535-552. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716408080235 Kormos, J. (2017). The effects of specific learning difficulties on processes of multilingual language development. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 37, 30-44. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026719051700006X Lachmann, T., Bergstrom, K., Huber, J. & Nuerk, H.C. (2022). Diagnosis of dyslexia and dyscalculia: Challenges and controversies. In M.A. Skeide (Ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of Dyslexia and Dyscalculia (pg. 383-409). Cambridge University Press. Lee, L. W. (2008). Development and validation of a reading-related assessment battery in Malay for the purpose of dyslexia assessment. Annals of Dyslexia, 58(1), 37-57. https://doi.org//10.1007/s11881-007-0011-0 Lee, J. A., Lee, S., Yusoff, N. F. M., Ong, P. H., Nordin, Z. S., & Winskel, H. (2020). An Early Reading Assessment Battery for Multilingual Learners in Malaysia. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1700. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01700 Lefly, D. L., & Pennington, B. F. (2000). Reliability and validity of the adult reading history questionnaire. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(3), 286-296. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940003300306 Li, P., Sepanski, S., & Zhao, X. (2006). Language history questionnaire: A web-based interface for bilingual research. Behaviour Research Methods, 38(2), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03192770 Lindgrén, S. A., & Laine, M. (2007). The adaptation of an adult group screening test for dyslexia into Finland‐Swedish: Normative data for university students and the effects of language background on test performance. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48(5), 419-432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00592.x Lim, I. (2017, July 3). What you should know about Chinese schools in Malaysia. Malay Mail. https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2017/07/03/what-you-should-know-about-chinese-schools-in-malaysia/1412233 McBride-Chang, C., Liu, P. D., Wong, T., Wong, A., & Shu, H. (2012). Specific reading difficulties in Chinese, English, or both: Longitudinal markers of phonological awareness, morphological awareness, and RAN in Hong Kong Chinese children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(6), 503-514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411400748 Melby-Lervåg, M., & Lervåg, A. (2014). Reading comprehension and its underlying components in second-language learners: A meta-analysis of studies comparing first-and second-language learners. Psychological Bulletin, 140(2), 409. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033890 Ministry of Education Malaysia (2013). Malaysian Education Blueprint 2013-2025 (Preschool to Post-Secondary Education). Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Tse, CS., Yap, M.J., Chan, YL. Sze, W.P., Shaoul, C. & Lin, D. (2017). The Chinese Lexicon Project: A megastudy of lexical decision performance for 25,000+ traditional Chinese two-character compound words. Behavior Research, 49, 1503–1519. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0810-5 Verhoeven, L. & Perfetti, C. (2022). Universals in learning to read across languages and writing systems. Scientific Studies of Reading, 26 (2), 150-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2021.1938575 Wang, M., Koda, K., & Perfetti, C. A. (2003). Alphabetic and nonalphabetic L1 effects in English word identification: A comparison of Korean and Chinese English L2 learners. Cognition, 87(2), 129-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00232-9 Yap, M., Liow, S.J.R., Jalil, S.B. & Faizal, S.S.B. (2010). The Malay lexicon project: A database of lexical statistics for 9,592 words. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 992-1003. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.4.992 Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: a psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 3. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

University of Reading

CentAUR: Central Archive at the University of Reading

Accessibility navigation

Dynamic tests as a language-free method for assessing reading in a multilingual setting

Abstract/Summary

Page navigation

See also

Footer navigation