Accessibility navigation


Evaluating the quality of life impact of recurrent urinary tract infection: validation and refinement of the Recurrent UTI Impact Questionnaire (RUTIIQ)

Newlands, A. F. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4718-0075, Kramer, M., Roberts, L., Maxwell, K., Price, J. L. and Finlay, K. A. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8997-2652 (2024) Evaluating the quality of life impact of recurrent urinary tract infection: validation and refinement of the Recurrent UTI Impact Questionnaire (RUTIIQ). Neurourology and Urodynamics, 43 (4). pp. 902-214. ISSN 1520-6777

[img]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.

1MB
[img] Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.

228kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1002/nau.25426

Abstract/Summary

Background and aims: Recurrent urinary tract infection (rUTI) has significant negative consequences for a wide variety of quality of life (QoL) domains. Without adequate validation and assessment of the unique insights of people living with rUTI, clinical results cannot be fully understood. The Recurrent UTI Impact Questionnaire (RUTIIQ), a novel patient-reported outcome measure of rUTI psychosocial impact, has been robustly developed with extensive patient and clinician input to facilitate enhanced rUTI management and research. This study aimed to confirm the structural validity of the RUTIIQ, assessing its strength and bifactor model fit. Methods: A sample of 389 adults experiencing rUTI (96.9% female, aged 18–87 years) completed an online cross-sectional survey comprising a demographic questionnaire and the RUTIIQ. A bifactor graded response model was fitted to the data, optimising the questionnaire structure based on item fit, discrimination capability, local dependence, and differential item functioning. Results: The final RUTIIQ demonstrated excellent bifactor model fit (RMSEA = .054, CFI = .99, SRMSR = .052), and mean-square fit indices indicated that all included items were productive for measurement (MNSQ = .52 – 1.41). The final questionnaire comprised an 18-item general ‘rUTI QoL impact’ factor, and five sub-factor domains measuring ‘personal wellbeing’ (3 items), ‘social wellbeing’ (4 items), ‘work and activity interference’ (4 items), ‘patient satisfaction’ (4 items), and ‘sexual wellbeing’ (3 items). Together, the general factor and five sub-factors explained 81.6% of the common model variance. All factor loadings were greater than .30 and communalities greater than .60, indicating good model fit and structural validity. Conclusions: The 18-item RUTIIQ is a robust, patient-tested questionnaire with excellent psychometric properties, which capably assesses the patient experience of rUTI-related impact to QoL and healthcare satisfaction. Facilitating standardised patient monitoring and improved shared decision-making, the RUTIIQ delivers the unique opportunity to improve patient-centred care.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Interdisciplinary centres and themes > Pain Research
Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Psychology
Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Nutrition and Health
ID Code:115144
Uncontrolled Keywords:Patient-reported outcomes; Chronic pain; Women’s health; Psychosocial outcomes; Item response theory; Bifactor model; Patient experience
Publisher:Wiley

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation