A non‐parametric way to estimate observation errors based on ensemble innovationsHu, C.‐C. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3020-8975, Van Leeuwen, P. J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2325-5340 and Geer, A. J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9476-5519 (2024) A non‐parametric way to estimate observation errors based on ensemble innovations. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. ISSN 1477-870X
It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing. To link to this item DOI: 10.1002/qj.4710 Abstract/SummaryPrevious studies that inferred the observation error statistics from the innovation statistics can only provide the second moment of the error probability density function (pdf). However, the observation errors are sometimes non‐Gaussian, for example, for observation operators with unknown representation errors, or for bounded observations. In this study, we propose a new method, the Deconvolution‐based Observation Error Estimation (DOEE), to infer the full observation error pdf. DOEE does not rely on linear assumptions on the observation operator, the optimality of the data assimilation algorithm, or implicit Gaussian assumptions on the error pdf. The main assumption of DOEE is the availability of an ensemble of background forecasts following the independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) assumption. We conduct idealized experiments to demonstrate the ability of the DOEE to accurately retrieve a non‐Gaussian (bimodal, skewed, or bounded) observation error pdf. We then apply the DOEE to construct a state‐dependent observation error model for satellite radiances by stratifying the observation errors based on cloud amount. In general, we find that the observation error pdfs in many categories are skewed. By adding a new predictor, total column water vapor (TCWV), into the state‐dependent model, we find that for cloudy pixels, when TCWV is small, the observation error pdfs are quite similar and Gaussian‐like, whereas when TCWV is large, the observation error pdfs differ for different cloud amount, while all of them are positively biased. This result suggests that exploring other predictors, like cloud type, might improve the stratification of the observation error model. We also discuss ways to include a non‐parametric observation error pdf into modern data assimilation schemes, including a consideration of the strong‐constraint 4D‐Var perspective, as well as the implications for other observation types including observations with bounded range.
Download Statistics DownloadsDownloads per month over past year Altmetric Deposit Details University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record |