Accessibility navigation


Under pressure: employee work stress, supervisory mentoring support, and employee career success

Erdogan, B. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8077-8546, Kudret, S. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3410-1104, Campion, E. D. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1555-2089, Bauer, T. N. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6443-636X, McCarthy, J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7320-6833 and Cheng, B. H. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3235-5634 (2024) Under pressure: employee work stress, supervisory mentoring support, and employee career success. Personnel Psychology. ISSN 1744-6570

[img]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.

822kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1111/peps.12662

Abstract/Summary

Despite consistent findings that stressed employees benefit from social support, these employees do not always have access to such support. We propose and test a conceptual model suggesting employee work stress will negatively affect supervisory career and psychosocial mentoring support. Drawing from social exchange theory, we predict this will indirectly affect employee career success (lower career satisfaction and promotability ratings, fewer promotions), and that the relationship between employee work stress and lower supervisory mentoring support can be explained by lower levels of work engagement experienced by, and attributed to, stressed employees. We tested our model across three studies. In Study 1, we collected four waves of multisource field data (254 employees, 127 managers, and company records) at a large postal organization in the United Kingdom (UK). Employee work stress was negatively related to supervisor career and psychosocial mentoring support, and indirectly affected career satisfaction and manager promotability ratings of employees via supervisor career mentoring support. Cross‐lagged panel analyses in a supplemental study additionally supported the proposed directionality of relationships. Study 2 included data across three waves from employees in Hong Kong (n = 137) and showed that employee work stress had indirect effects on supervisor career and psychosocial mentoring via lower employee engagement. In Study 3, using data from supervisors in the UK (n = 240) we showed that supervisor perceived employee stress had indirect effects on their provision of supervisor career and psychosocial mentoring support via lower perceived employee engagement.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Henley Business School
ID Code:119075
Publisher:Wiley

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation