Public interest in online information on recurrent urinary tract infections is greatest for information with the poorest publication quality

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access)
- Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Thaker, S., Chan, J. Y. H. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7952-9123, Thaker, K. N. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8451-1240, Takele, R. A., Newlands, A. F. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4718-0075, Maxwell, K., Bhanji, Y., Kramer, M. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9242-5203 and Scotland, K. B. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0749-3859 (2024) Public interest in online information on recurrent urinary tract infections is greatest for information with the poorest publication quality. Pathogens, 13 (12). 1125. ISSN 2076-0817 doi: 10.3390/pathogens13121125

Abstract/Summary

Background: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most prevalent bacterial infections. With many patients turning to the Internet as a health resource, this study seeks to understand public engagement with online resources concerning recurrent UTIs (rUTIs), assess their reliability, and identify common questions/concerns about rUTIs. Methods: Social media analysis tool BuzzSumo was used to calculate online engagement (likes, shares, comments, views) with information on rUTIs. The reliability of highly engaged articles was evaluated using the DISCERN questionnaire. Highly engaged categories were entered as keywords in Google Trends to quantify search interest. To categorize patient-specific concerns, a database containing anonymously collected patient questions about rUTIs was created. Results: BuzzSumo revealed four search categories: general information, treatment, causes, and herbal remedies. DISCERN scores indicated moderate reliability overall; however, the “herbal remedies” category demonstrated poor reliability despite high engagement. Google Trends analysis highlighted “causes” and “treatment” searches as highest in relative interest. The 10 most popular categories of concern were antibiotics, microbiome, vaccines, prevention, pelvic pain, sex, testing, symptoms, diet/lifestyle, and hormones. Conclusions: People living with rUTIs demonstrate key concerns and often seek information online, yet articles with high engagement often contain unreliable information. Healthcare professionals may consider counteracting misinformation by providing evidence-based information online about rUTIs.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/120032
Identification Number/DOI 10.3390/pathogens13121125
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Psychology
Publisher MDPI
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record