Accessibility navigation


Reshoring to survive? The other side of de-globalization

D’Ambrosio, A. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7946-7695 and Lavoratori, K. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0078-4525 (2025) Reshoring to survive? The other side of de-globalization. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics. ISSN 1972-4977

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.

1MB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1007/s40812-025-00342-7

Abstract/Summary

Abstract As the costs of global production fragmentation rise, advanced economies have introduced policies that promote the relocation of previously offshored tasks back to the home country, encouraging investment in automation and green technologies. However, the evidence on reshoring remains limited. Drawing on Antràs (De-globalisation? Global value chains in the post-COVID-19 age. National Bureau of Economic Research: Technical report, 2020), we offer a conceptual framework to understand why firms reshore and why such decisions remains relatively rare. Value chains are “sticky”, particularly for large firms, and investment in automation implies new costs to firms already burdened by rising offshoring costs. As a result, globalization shocks have uneven impacts, varying by firm size and their ability to manage both explicit and “hidden” costs of offshoring. For larger firms, automation-driven reshoring may not be as profitable as alternatives like “nearshoring” or “friendshoring.” In contrast, smaller and less internationally exposed firms may turn to reshoring to contain losses—ultimately, to survive.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Henley Business School > International Business and Strategy
ID Code:122457
Publisher:Springer

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation