Accessibility navigation


An analysis of the optimal research and development investment level of contractor using the panel threshold regression model

Whang, S.-W., Flanagan, R. and Kim, K. P. (2025) An analysis of the optimal research and development investment level of contractor using the panel threshold regression model. International Journal of Construction Management. ISSN 2331-2327

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.

1MB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2025.2496952

Abstract/Summary

This study explores the threshold effect between R&D investment and firm performance in the construction industry, focusing on optimizing R&D spending in this capital-intensive sector. Unlike industries with shorter innovation cycles, construction requires long project durations, high costs, and regulatory compliance, making strategic R&D allocation essential. Using the panel threshold regression model (PTRM), the study analyses data from 136 Korean construction firms with over 100 employees and in-house R&D centres. Threshold values of 0.47% for R&D project cost and 2.25% for researcher ratio are identified, beyond which investment efficiency declines. PTRM is suitable for detecting nonlinear effects, though future studies should test alternative models for greater reliability. While firm-specific financial factors are controlled, external influences such as market dynamics and government policies are not considered. A five-year lag is assumed between R&D investment and outcomes, aligning with South Korea's planning norms, but alternative lags are recommended for further study. The findings offer practical insights for SMEs in managing R&D and financial constraints, with relevance extending beyond Korea to developing nations seeking to close technological gaps. Future research should refine sector-specific benchmarks and consider firm size variations for more applicable R&D strategies.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Science > School of the Built Environment > Construction Management and Engineering
ID Code:122943
Publisher:Taylor & Francis

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation