A comparative study of TEEP and IELTS for transnational education (TNE) students and their relationship to subject study

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access)
- Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Li, D., Wilding, E. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0035-5537, Slaght, J. and Ouyang, T. (2025) A comparative study of TEEP and IELTS for transnational education (TNE) students and their relationship to subject study. International Journal of English for Academic Purposes: Research and Practice, 5 (2). ISSN 2634-4610 doi: 10.3828/ijeap.2025.11

Abstract/Summary

This paper reports on a comparative study of two English language tests in a transnational education (TNE) context: TEEP (Test of English for Educational Purposes) developed at the University of Reading (U.K.) and IELTS (International English Language Testing System). Our study adopted a longitudinal mixed-methods design. Students’ TEEP and IELTS results were collected, and then two phases of focus groups with students were conducted to explore their perceptions of test-taking and academic study. Quantitative data were subject to statistical analysis and qualitative data to thematic analysis. Quantitative results showed that the students performed significantly better on Speaking and Writing in TEEP while they performed significantly better overall and on Listening and Reading in IELTS. Factor Analysis suggested both TEEP and IELTS tapped into one single underlying construct which we termed English-language proficiency. Qualitative results from focus groups illuminated the quantitative findings and the perceived relevance in their subject study.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/124892
Identification Number/DOI 10.3828/ijeap.2025.11
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > Global Academy
Publisher Liverpool University Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record