Accessibility navigation


Cloud feedback uncertainty in the equatorial Pacific across CMIP6 models

Hill, P. G. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9745-2120, Finney, D. L. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3334-6935 and Zelinka, M. D. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6570-5445 (2025) Cloud feedback uncertainty in the equatorial Pacific across CMIP6 models. Geophysical Research Letters, 52 (19). e2025GL117183. ISSN 1944-8007

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.

1MB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1029/2025gl117183

Abstract/Summary

Cloud feedback is the largest uncertainty in estimating Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity. In this study we focus on the equatorial Pacific, where CMIP6 model cloud feedback spread is notably large. Cloud radiative effects in this region are relevant for the global climate. Our findings show that models predict a consistent shift towards the ascent regime in response to El Nino‐like sea surface warming. Models diverge in terms of the radiative impact due to differences in cloud characteristics in ascent and subsidence regimes. Using the observed relationship between circulation regime and cloud radiative effect, we find a reduction in the regional mean cloud feedback estimate from 0.77 to 0.22 W m− 2 K− 1, though this does not substantially lessen the model spread in total feedback. Pathways to reduce this spread include: improving confidence in the regional ocean warming pattern, and using observations and models to understand cloud type and circulation interactions.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Meteorology
ID Code:125321
Publisher:American Geophysical Union

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation