Impacts of participatory arts-based interventions on well-being of older adults without dementia: an umbrella review and a conceptual artistic participation framework

[thumbnail of gnaf279.pdf]
Text
- Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Liu, T. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8194-5342, Lee, J. K. Q. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6528-9154, Kanagawa, H. S., He, L., Zhang, A. Y. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8566-521X, Lo, M. W. S., Leung, D. K. Y. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7255-2790, Wong, G. H. Y. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1331-942X and Lum, T. Y. S. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1196-5345 (2025) Impacts of participatory arts-based interventions on well-being of older adults without dementia: an umbrella review and a conceptual artistic participation framework. The Gerontologist. ISSN 1758-5341 doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaf279 (In Press)

Abstract/Summary

Background and objectives: While participatory arts are thought to benefit older adults’ well-being, evidence has focused on dementia. This umbrella review synthesizes evidence from systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) on the impacts of participatory arts for older adults without dementia, and conceptually organizes findings using the proposed “Aesthetic-Engagement-Creativity” (AEC) framework. Research Design and Methods: Following PRIOR guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane review and grey literature to September 2023, with an update in June 2025. Study characteristics and well-being outcomes were extracted. We used the AEC framework for conceptual categorization, assessed primary study overlap using the corrected covered area (CCA) and the methodological quality with the AMSTAR 2. Results: Eighteen reviews were included, with minimal study overlap (CCA = 1.96%). However, the evidence base was weak; 12 reviews were of low or critically low quality. A synthesis of the six moderate-to-high quality reviews revealed that dance was the most studied modality, associated with improved physical well-being. The benefits for other well-being domains and art modalities were mixed, and significant heterogeneity in study designs and measures complicated comparisons. Our retrospective application of the AEC framework suggests that considering participants’ aesthetic preferences and optimizing engagement and creativity levels may be important, but this link is speculative. Discussion and Implications: Participatory arts show potential for promoting well-being of older adults, but robust conclusions are constrained by the poor quality, underrepresented art modalities, and heterogeneity of the existing evidence. The AEC framework is offered as a conceptual tool requiring future empirical validation.

Altmetric Badge

Dimensions Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/127340
Identification Number/DOI 10.1093/geront/gnaf279
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Psychology
Publisher Oxford University Press (OUP)
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record