Board structure, R&D intensity and firm value relationship: evidence from the Anglo-Saxon technology sector

[thumbnail of Board structure, R and D intensity and firm value relationship-accepted.pdf]
Text
- Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only until 3 August 2027.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Uyar, A. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4660-1798, Goyal, R., Kakabadse, N. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9517-8279, Jiraporn, P. and Karaman, A. S. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5768-7382 (2026) Board structure, R&D intensity and firm value relationship: evidence from the Anglo-Saxon technology sector. Research in International Business and Finance, 84. 103331. ISSN 1878-3384 doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2026.103331

Abstract/Summary

Drawing on resource dependence theory, we examined the role of board structure in shaping firms’ research and development (R&D) intensity and market value within the technology sector in Anglo-Saxon countries. From 2655 firm observations across Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the UK, and the US for the 2002–2021 period, we found that R&D intensity increased firm market value. Additionally, larger and more gender-diverse boards can create synergy in generating value from R&D investments. Counterintuitively, despite its growing importance after the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, board independence failed to yield a synergy between R&D intensity and firm value. Given the research context, we can infer that excessive board independence may limit managers’ ability to think freely and take risks, which are essential for innovation.

Altmetric Badge

Dimensions Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/128296
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.ribaf.2026.103331
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Leadership, Organisations, Behaviour and Reputation
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record