Confidently uncertain: validating satellite ECV measurement uncertainty estimates

[thumbnail of Confidently_uncertain__Validating_ECV_uncertainty_estimates.pdf]
Text
- Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Verhoelst, T., Povey, A., Gruber, A., Bulgin, C. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4368-7386, Keppens, A., Compernolle, S. and Lamber, J.-C. (2026) Confidently uncertain: validating satellite ECV measurement uncertainty estimates. Surveys in Geophysics. ISSN 1573-0956 (In Press)

Abstract/Summary

The importance of uncertainty estimates for Essential Climate Variable (ECV) data records is well recognised. Most ECV observing systems now estimate and report uncertainties as part of the measurement and retrieval procedure instead of leaving uncertainty characterisation to a diagnostic "ex-post" validation/evaluation procedure. This paper focuses on the validation or evaluation of these prognostic "ex-ante" uncertainties provided with satellite ECV climate data records. In recent years, established validation protocols (primarily focused on the validation of the measurements themselves) have been extended to provide feedback on the prognostic uncertainties. Moreover, dedicated methods for uncertainty validation have been developed and applied across the Earth Observation community. In this review, we classify, describe, and illustrate these approaches under three categories: (1) those relying on comparison to independent in situ or other ground-based reference data, (2) those exploiting self-co-locations, i.e., the comparison between consecutive measurements by the same instrument undertaken appropriate conditions, and (3) those integrating a multitude of correlative (satellite) data sets. The principles behind each method are described with a common nomenclature, facilitating a clear identification of strengths and weaknesses, and the illustrations are chosen to cover the three Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) ECV domains (atmosphere, ocean, terrestrial) towards the aim of facilitating cross-domain knowledge transfer. Finally, the most common and critical gaps and challenges are listed to support the scoping of future work.

Item Type Article
URI https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/128302
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > National Centre for Earth Observation (NCEO)
Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Meteorology
Publisher Springer
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record