Judicial independence and political connection: evidence from China

[thumbnail of Chen 2026 CGIR.pdf]
Text
- Published Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Chen, X. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0597-4352 and Min, Y. (2026) Judicial independence and political connection: evidence from China. Corporate Governance: An International Review. ISSN 0964-8410 doi: 10.1111/corg.70031

Abstract/Summary

Research Question/Issue: Ample evidence highlights the importance of accumulating political assets to mitigate external uncertainty. However, relatively little is known about when firms decide to reduce their political connections. This study examines how firms adjust their politician appointments in response to the improvements in institutional quality. Research Findings/Insights: This study utilizes a unique research setting involving the establishment of circuit courts in China. As a part of judicial reform, the establishment of circuit courts substantially enhances local judicial independence. The results reveal that as judicial independence strengthens, firms tend to reduce their reliance on political connections and consequently appoint fewer politicians to their boards and/or top management teams. The negative relationship between judicial independence and politician appointments is more pronounced when firms are engaged in interfirm R&D collaboration and less pronounced when economic policy uncertainty is high. Theoretical/Academic Implications: Building on resource dependence theory, this study explores firms' nonmarket strategies by examining how they reduce engagement with local political connections as legal institutions improve. In addition, this study adds to the antecedents of political connections from an institutional perspective. Practitioner/Policy Implications: The findings highlight the value of legal reforms that promote judicial impartiality and in dependence. Moreover, practitioners can benefit from institutional improvements by balancing market and nonmarket strategies.

Altmetric Badge

Dimensions Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/128562
Identification Number/DOI 10.1111/corg.70031
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > International Business and Strategy
Publisher John Wiley
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record