Suicidal ideation and social media: how content of suicide-related threat affects recognition, threat appraisal, and willingness to intervene with suicidal users

[thumbnail of SMsuicidePaper_FINAL.pdf]
Text
- Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only until 23 March 2027.
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Hendley, T., Starkey, A., Trahan, K., Rivers, A., Cacace, S. C. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0419-4506 and Hill, R. M. (2026) Suicidal ideation and social media: how content of suicide-related threat affects recognition, threat appraisal, and willingness to intervene with suicidal users. Death Studies. ISSN 1091-7683 doi: 10.1080/07481187.2026.2646869

Abstract/Summary

Suicide remains a public health concern, and social media platforms have become spaces where suicidal thoughts and behaviors are expressed and observed. This research examines how young adults interpret and respond to suicide-related content on social media. In Study 1 (N = 709), participants viewed mock posts and identified those indicating suicidality; 77% were accurately recognized, particularly those with photos of lethal means. However, 23% of suicidal posts were missed, revealing detection gaps. Study 2 (N = 722) used a within-subjects design to examine how post features (e.g., explicit language, temporal immediacy, and photo inclusion) influence threat appraisal and intervention. Posts were perceived more high risk when they included such factors. Additionally, participants were more likely to report a willingness to engage in indirect responses than direct intervention. Findings emphasize the importance of multimodal cues in online risk detection and the need for interventions that promote effective digital bystander responses.

Altmetric Badge

Dimensions Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/129165
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/07481187.2026.2646869
Refereed Yes
Divisions No Reading authors. Back catalogue items
Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Psychology
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record