• Benjamin, Andrew, ed. 1989. The Lyotard Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Best, Steven, and Douglas Kellner. 1991. Postmodern Theory: Critical Interrogations. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Bignell, Jonathan. 2000. Postmodern Media Culture. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Bolter, Jay David, and Richard Grusin. 2000. Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge, Mass., London: MIT.
• Brown, Tom. 2008. ‘Spectacle/Gender/History: The Case of Gone with the Wind.’ Screen 49 (2): 157–178.
• Bukatman, Scott. 1998. ‘Zooming Out: The End of Offscreen Space.’ In The New American Cinema, edited by Jon Lewis, 248–272. London: Duke University Press.
• Darley, Andrew. 2000. Visual Digital Culture: Surface Play and Spectacle in New Media Genres. London; New York: Routledge.
• Douglas, Susan J. 1995. Where the Girls are: Growing up Female with the Mass Media. New York: Three Rivers Press.
• Ebert, Roger. 2000. Charlie’s Angels. Chicago Sun-Times. http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID1⁄4/20001103/REVIEWS/11030301/1023
• Fiske, John. 1989. Television Culture. London: Routledge.
• Keathley, Christian. 2006. Cinephilia and History, or the Wind in the Trees. Bloomington:
Indiana University Press.
• King, Geoff. 2000. Spectacular Narratives: Hollywood in the Age of the Blockbuster. London: I.B. Tauris.
• Lavik, Erlend. 2008. ‘The Battle for the Blockbuster: Discourses of Spectacle and Excess.’ New Review of Film and Television Studies 6 (2): 169–187.
• Lawrence, Amy. 2003. ‘Counterfeit Motion: The Animated Films of Eadweard Muybridge.’ Film Quarterly 57 (2): 15–25.
• Lyotard, Jean-Francois. 1971. Discours, Figure. Paris: Klincksieck.
• Lyotard, Jean-Francois. 1986. ‘Acinema.’ In Narrative, Apparatus, Ideology: A Film Theory Reader. Translated by Paisley N. Livingston and edited by Philip Rosen, 349–359. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Manovich, Lev. 2001. The Language of New Media. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
• Medhurst, Andy. 2001. ‘Charlie’s Angels.’ Sight and Sound 11 (1): 43–44.
• Mogilevich, Mariana. 2002. ‘Charlie’s Pussycats.’ Film Quarterly 55 (3): 38–44.
• Mulvey, Laura. 1975. ‘Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema.’ Screen 16 (3): 6–18.
• Neale, Steve. 1979. ‘Triumph of the Will: Notes on Documentary and Spectacle.’ Screen
• 20 (1): 63–86. Neupert, Richard. 1999. ‘Looking at Film.’ In The Cinema Book, edited by Pam Cook, and Mieke Bernink. 2nd ed., 319–323. London: BFI.
• O’Day, Marc. 2004. ‘Beauty in Motion: Gender, Spectacle and Action Babe Cinema.’ In Action and Adventure Cinema, edited by Yvonne Tasker, 201–218. London; New York: Routledge.
• Pierson, Michele. 1999. ‘CGI Effects in Hollywood Science-Fiction Cinema 1989–95: The Wonder Years.’ Screen 40 (2): 158–176.
• Pierson, Michele. 2002. Special Effects: Still in Search of Wonder. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Pye, Douglas. 2007. ‘Movies and Tone.’ In Close-Up 02: Movies and Tone, Reading Rohmer, Voices in Film, edited by John Gibbs, and Douglas Pye, 1–80. London: Wallflower Press.
• Seiter, Ellen. 1985. ‘The Hegemony of Leisure: Aaron Spelling Presents Hotel.’ In Television in Transition, edited by Phillip Drummond, and Richard Paterson, 135–145. London: BFI.
• Soria, Joe. 2000. ‘Charlie’s Angels.’ http://buscemifan.tripod.com/reviews/movies2000/charliesangels.htm
• Sperb, Jason, and Scott Balcerzak, eds. 2009. Cinephilia in the Age of Digital Reproduction: Film, Pleasure and Digital Culture. Vol. 1. London: Wallflower Press.
• Thompson, Kristin. 1986. ‘The Concept of Cinematic Excess.’ In Narrative, Apparatus, Ideology: A Film Theory Reader, edited by Philip Rosen, 130–142. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Trahair, Lisa. 2005. ‘Figural Vision: Freud, Lyotard and Early Cinematic Comedy.’ Screen 46 (2): 175–194.
• Wood, Aylish. 2002. ‘Timespaces in Spectacular Cinema: Crossing the Great Divide of Spectacle Versus Narrative.’ Screen 43 (4): 370–386.
• Wyatt, Justin. 1994. High Concept: Movies and Marketing in Hollywood. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Lists
Lists
