Accessibility navigation

Why Lex30 may not be an improved method of assessing productive vocabulary in an L2

Lists
Tools

Clenton, J. (2005) Why Lex30 may not be an improved method of assessing productive vocabulary in an L2. Studies in Language and Culture, 31. pp. 47-59. ISSN 0387-4478

Full text not archived in this repository.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.


Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Literature and Languages > English Language and Applied Linguistics
ID Code:35919
Publisher:Osaka University Press
Deposit Details

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation

See also