Accessibility navigation

The role of fixation disengagement in the parallel programming of sequences of saccades

McSorley, E. ORCID:, Gilchrist, I. D. and McCloy, R. ORCID: (2019) The role of fixation disengagement in the parallel programming of sequences of saccades. Experimental brain research, 237 (11). pp. 3033-3045. ISSN 1432-1106

[img] Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.


It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05641-9


One of the core mechanisms involved in the control of saccade responses to selected target stimuli is the disengagement from the current fixation location, so that the next saccade can be executed. To carry out everyday visual tasks, we make multiple eye movements that can be programmed in parallel. However, the role of disengagement in the parallel programming of saccades has not been examined. It is well established that the need for disengagement slows down saccadic response time. This may be important in allowing the system to program accurate eye movements and have a role to play in the control of multiple eye movements but as yet this remains untested. Here, we report two experiments that seek to examine whether fixation disengagement reduces saccade latencies when the task completion demands multiple saccade responses. A saccade contingent paradigm was employed and participants were asked to execute saccadic eye movements to a series of seven targets while manipulating when these targets were shown. This both promotes fixation disengagement and controls the extent that parallel programming can occur. We found that trial duration decreased as more targets were made available prior to fixation: this was a result both of a reduction in the number of saccades being executed and in their saccade latencies. This supports the view that even when fixation disengagement is not required, parallel programming of multiple sequential saccadic eye movements is still present. By comparison with previous published data, we demonstrate a substantial speeded of response times in these condition ("a gap effect") and that parallel programming is attenuated in these conditions.

Item Type:Article
Divisions:Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Psychology
ID Code:86491
Uncontrolled Keywords:Gap effect, Parallel programming, Saccade, Sequences

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation