Accessibility navigation


Sex and gender differences in caregiving burden experienced by family caregivers of persons with dementia: a systematic review

Xiong, C., Biscardi, M., Cameron, J., Mihailidis, A., Astell, A. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6822-9472, Nalder, E. and Colantonio, A. (2020) Sex and gender differences in caregiving burden experienced by family caregivers of persons with dementia: a systematic review. PLoS ONE, 15 (450). e0231848. ISSN 1932-6203

[img]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.

958kB
[img] Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only

466kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231848

Abstract/Summary

Objectives Much is known about the demands of caregiving for a person with dementia (PWD) and its effects on family caregivers, however sex and gender aspects have received less attention. We synthesized the evidence on sex and gender distinctions in: (1) the caregiving burden and (2) the impact of caregiving on the physical and mental health of family caregivers of PWD. Design Systematic review. Data sources Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature between January 2007 and October 2019 were searched Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Studies included in the review met the following criteria: (1) Examine experiences and/or impacts of caregiving among family caregivers of individuals with any form of dementia; (2) Report sex and/or gender distribution of study population and/or report results stratified by sex and/or gender, and (3) Include both male and female family caregivers. Data extraction and synthesis Two independent reviewers extracted the data and assessed risk of bias using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist and National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-sectional Studies. Data were synthesized using a narrative synthesis approach. Results A total of 22 studies were included. Caregiving burden was measured using various methods. A majority of studies reported higher burden among females. Most studies that did not report a sex and gender difference accounted for confounders. Findings on sex and gender differences on physical and mental health conditions were inconsistent with most studies failing to account for confounding variables in their analyses. Conclusions The current evidence on sex and gender differences in caregiving burden, mental and physical health is limited. Findings suggest the presence of sex and gender differences in caregiving burden. Given the variety of mental and physical health constructs that were examined, further research is required to substantiate the evidence.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Ageing
Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Psychology
ID Code:89942
Publisher:Public Library of Science

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation