Accessibility navigation


Expert communication on Twitter: comparing economists and scientists’ social networks, topics and communicative styles

Della Giusta, M. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3959-4451, Jaworska, S. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7465-2245 and Vukadinovic Greetham, D. (2021) Expert communication on Twitter: comparing economists and scientists’ social networks, topics and communicative styles. Public Understanding of Science, 30 (1). pp. 75-90. ISSN 1361-6609

[img]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.

328kB
[img] Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only

979kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1177/0963662520957252

Abstract/Summary

Experts are increasingly using social media to communicate with the wider public, prompted by the need to demonstrate impact and public engagement. While previous research on the use of social media by experts focused on single topics and performed sentiment analysis, we propose to extend the scope by investigating experts' networks, topics and communicative styles. We perform social and semantic network as well language analysis of top tweeting scientists and economists. We find that economists tweet less, mention fewer people and have fewer Twitter conversations with members of the public than scientists. Scientists use a more informal and involved style and engage wider audiences through multimedia contents, while economists use more jargon, and tend to favour traditional written media. The results point to differences in experts’ communicative practices online that might have to do with the disciplinary ways of ‘talking’ posing obstacles to an effective public communication of expert knowledge.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Literature and Languages > English Language and Applied Linguistics
Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Politics, Economics and International Relations > Economics
Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Mathematics and Statistics > Centre for the Mathematics of Human Behaviour (CMOHB)
ID Code:92297
Uncontrolled Keywords:Twitter, expert communication, communicative style, networks, sentiment, involvement, corpus linguistics, keywords, key terms
Publisher:Sage

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation