# Model error estimation using the expectation maximization algorithm and a particle flow filter

Lucini, M. M. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6615-7711, Van Leeuwen, P. J. and Pulido, M. (2021) Model error estimation using the expectation maximization algorithm and a particle flow filter. SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification, 9 (2). pp. 681-707. ISSN 2166-2525

 Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version

1MB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1137/19M1297300

## Abstract/Summary

Model error covariances play a central role in the performance of data assimilation methods applied to nonlinear state-space models. However, these covariances are largely unknown in most of the applications. A misspecification of the model error covariance has a strong impact on the computation of the posterior probability density function, leading to unreliable estimations and even to a total failure of the assimilation procedure. In this work, we propose the combination of the expectation maximization (EM) algorithm with an efficient particle filter to estimate the model error covariance using a batch of observations. Based on the EM algorithm principles, the proposed method encompasses two stages: the expectation stage, in which a particle filter is used with the present updated value of the model error covariance as given to find the probability density function that maximizes the likelihood, followed by a maximization stage, in which the expectation under the probability density function found in the expectation step is maximized as a function of the elements of the model error covariance. This novel algorithm here presented combines the EM algorithm with a fixed point algorithm and does not require a particle smoother to approximate the posterior densities. We demonstrate that the new method accurately and efficiently solves the linear model problem. Furthermore, for the chaotic nonlinear Lorenz-96 model the method is stable even for observation error covariance 10 times larger than the estimated model error covariance matrix and also is successful in moderately large dimensional situations where the dimension of the estimated matrix is 40 \times 40.

Item Type: Article Yes Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Meteorology 99536 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics