Anion-dependent strength scale of interactions in ionic liquids from x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, ab initio molecular dynamics, and density functional theoryGousseva, E., Towers Tompkins, F. K., Seymour, J. M., Parker, L. G. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8727-4116, Clarke, C. J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2698-3490, Palgrave, R. G. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4522-2486, Bennett, R. A. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6266-3510, Grau-Crespo, R. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8845-1719 and Lovelock, K. R. J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1431-269X (2024) Anion-dependent strength scale of interactions in ionic liquids from x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, ab initio molecular dynamics, and density functional theory. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 128 (20). pp. 5030-5043. ISSN 1520-6106
It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing. To link to this item DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c00362 Abstract/SummaryUsing a combination of experiments and calculations, we have gained new insights into the nature of anion–cation interactions in ionic liquids (ILs). An X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)-derived anion-dependent electrostatic interaction strength scale, determined using XPS core-level binding energies for IL cations, is presented here for 39 different anions, with at least 18 new anions included. Linear correlations of experimental XPS core-level binding energies for IL cations with (a) calculated core binding energies (ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations were used to generate high-quality model IL structures followed by single-point density functional theory (DFT) to obtain calculated core binding energies), (b) experimental XPS core-level binding energies for IL anions, and (c) other anion-dependent interaction strength scales led to three main conclusions. First, the effect of different anions on the cation can be related to ground-state interactions. Second, the variations of anion-dependent interactions with the identity of the anion are best rationalized in terms of electrostatic interactions and not occupied valence state/unoccupied valence state interactions or polarizability-driven interactions. Therefore, the XPS-derived anion-dependent interaction strength scale can be explained using a simple electrostatic model based on electrostatic site potentials. Third, anion–probe interactions, irrespective of the identity of the probe, are primarily electrostatic, meaning that our electrostatic interaction strength scale captures some inherent, intrinsic property of anions independent of the probe used to measure the interaction strength scale.
Download Statistics DownloadsDownloads per month over past year Altmetric Deposit Details University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record |