Advancing landscape characterisation: a comparative study of machine learning and manual classification methods

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access)
- Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
[thumbnail of ECOINF-Tingting Huang - accepted.docx]
Text
- Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Huang, T., Griffiths, G., Huang, B., Zhu, J., Warnock, S. and Lukac, M. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8535-6334 (2025) Advancing landscape characterisation: a comparative study of machine learning and manual classification methods. Ecological Informatics, 90. 103349. ISSN 1574-9541 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103349

Abstract/Summary

This study evaluates and compares three automated classification methods for Landscape Character Assessment (LCA) to assess their suitability for consistent, objective, and scalable mapping. We applied One-pass Multi-view Clustering (OPMC), Self-Organising Feature Map clustering (SOFM), and Swin Transformer Segmentation Clustering (STSC) to classify Landscape Character Types in Bannau Brycheiniog National Park, Wales, UK. Their outputs were compared against an expert-based manual classification (EBMC) using pixel-by-pixel accuracy assessment. To interpret model outputs, we used SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis to quantify the influence of key landscape character elements on classification outcomes. STSC showed the highest agreement with EBMC, followed by SOFM and OPMC. Across all models, geology, historic landscape, and soil type were the most influential variables, while habitat and landform contributed less. The automated methods demonstrated strong spatial coherence and boundary delineation comparable to expert-based mapping. Our findings demonstrate the potential of automated approaches to improve the consistency, efficiency, and objectivity of LCA and support their integration into scalable landscape characterisation frameworks for planning and management applications. Source code and datasets are available on GitHub (https://github.com/TingtingHwang/BBNP_LCA).

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/123788
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103349
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of Sustainable Land Management > Centre for Agri-environmental Research (CAER)
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record