Improving implied volatility forecasts for American options using neural networks

[thumbnail of This is the accepted version]
Text (This is the accepted version)
- Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Jiang, H., Lazar, E. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8761-0754 and Marra, M. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0810-7323 (2026) Improving implied volatility forecasts for American options using neural networks. The Journal of Futures Markets. ISSN 1096-9934 (In Press)

Abstract/Summary

This paper explores the application of neural networks to improve pricing of American options. Focusing on both American and European options on the S&P 100 index from January 2016 to August 2023, we integrate neural networks to model the difference between market-implied and model-implied volatilities derived from the Black-Scholes and Heston models. We also employ a pure neural network which does not use pricing models. Our study compares two neural network training architectures: independent training, where the network is trained anew daily, and sequential training, which uses the previous day’s network setup as starting point to retrain the network. The findings reveal that a pure neural network with sequential training significantly reduces the root mean square error (RMSE) of implied volatility predictions compared to traditional pricing models. The inclusion of European option data in the training can enhance the models’ forecasting performance, though its effectiveness varies depending on market conditions.

Item Type Article
URI https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/128511
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Finance and Accounting
Publisher Wiley
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record