Using reanalysis data to quantify extreme wind power generation statistics : a 33 year case study in Great Britain
Cannon, D.J., Brayshaw, D.J., Methven, J., Coker, P.J. and Lenaghan, D. (2015) Using reanalysis data to quantify extreme wind power generation statistics : a 33 year case study in Great Britain. Renewable Energy, 75. pp. 767-778. ISSN 0960-1481
To link to this item DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.024
With a rapidly increasing fraction of electricity generation being sourced from wind, extreme wind power generation events such as prolonged periods of low (or high) generation and ramps in generation, are a growing concern for the efficient and secure operation of national power systems. As extreme events occur infrequently, long and reliable meteorological records are required to accurately estimate their characteristics. Recent publications have begun to investigate the use of global meteorological “reanalysis” data sets for power system applications, many of which focus on long-term average statistics such as monthly-mean generation. Here we demonstrate that reanalysis data can also be used to estimate the frequency of relatively short-lived extreme events (including ramping on sub-daily time scales). Verification against 328 surface observation stations across the United Kingdom suggests that near-surface wind variability over spatiotemporal scales greater than around 300 km and 6 h can be faithfully reproduced using reanalysis, with no need for costly dynamical downscaling. A case study is presented in which a state-of-the-art, 33 year reanalysis data set (MERRA, from NASA-GMAO), is used to construct an hourly time series of nationally-aggregated wind power generation in Great Britain (GB), assuming a fixed, modern distribution of wind farms. The resultant generation estimates are highly correlated with recorded data from National Grid in the recent period, both for instantaneous hourly values and for variability over time intervals greater than around 6 h. This 33 year time series is then used to quantify the frequency with which different extreme GB-wide wind power generation events occur, as well as their seasonal and inter-annual variability. Several novel insights into the nature of extreme wind power generation events are described, including (i) that the number of prolonged low or high generation events is well approximated by a Poission-like random process, and (ii) whilst in general there is large seasonal variability, the magnitude of the most extreme ramps is similar in both summer and winter. An up-to-date version of the GB case study data as well as the underlying model are freely available for download from our website: http://www.met.reading.ac.uk/~energymet/data/Cannon2014/.
 OFGEM. Electricity capacity assessment report. Office of Gas and Electricity Markets; 2013.  Mackay DJC. Sustainable energy - without the hot air. UIT Cambridge; 2009.  Sinden G. Characteristics of the UK wind resource: long-term patterns and relationship to electricity demand. Energy Policy 2007;35:112e27.  Earl N, Dorling S, Hewston R, von Glasow R. 1980e2010 variability in u.k. surface wind climate. J Clim 2013;26:1172e91.  Gross R, Heptonstall P, Anderson D, Green T, Leach M, Skea J. The costs and impacts of intermittency. UK Energy Research Centre’s Technology and Policy Assessment (TPA) function; 2006.  Zachary S, Dent C, Brayshaw DJ. Challenges in quantifying wind generation's contribution to securing peak demand. In: IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, Detroit, MI; 2011. p. 1e8.  Brayshaw DJ, Troccoli A, Fordham R, Methven J. The impact of large scale atmospheric circulation patterns on wind power generation and its potential predictability: a case study over the UK. Renew Energy 2011;36:2087e96.  Bett P, Thornton HE, Clark RT. European wind variability over 140 yr. Adv Sci Res 2013;10:51e8. 12th EMS annual meeting and 9th European conference on applied climatology (ECAC) 2012.  P€oyry. Impact of intermittency: how wind variability could change the shape of the British and Irish electricity markets. P€oyry Energy Consulting; 2009. Available online at: www.poyry.co.uk/news.  Früh W-G. Long-term wind resource and uncertainty estimation using wind records from Scotland as example. Renew Energy 2013;50:1014e26.  Leahy PG, McKeogh EJ. Persistence of low wind speed conditions and implications for wind power variability. Wind Energy 2013;16:575e86.  Kiss P, Varga L, J�anosi IM. Comparison of wind power estimates from the ECMWF reanalyses with direct turbine measurements. J Renew Sustain Energy 2009;1:033105.  Kubik ML, Brayshaw DJ, Coker PJ, Barlow JF. Exploring the role of reanalysis data in simulating regional wind generation variability over Northern Ireland. Renew Energy 2013;57:558e61.  Staffell I, Green R. How does wind farm performace decline with age? Renew Energy 2014;66:775e86.  Brower MC, Barton MS, Lled�o L, Dubois J. A study of wind speed variability using global reanalysis data. 2013. aWS Truepower technical report.  Rienecker MM, Suarez MJ, Gelaro R, Todling R, Bacmeister J, Liu E, et al. MERRA - NASA's modern-era retrospective analysis for research and applications. J Clim 2011;24:3624e48.  Dee DP, Uppala SM, Simmons AJ, Berrisford P, Poli P, Kobayashi S, et al. The ERA-interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q J R Meteorol Soc 2011;137:553e97.  Decker M, Brunke MA, Wang Z, Sakaguchi K, Zeng X, Bosilovich M. Evaluation of the reanalysis products from GSFC, NCEP, and ECMWF using flux tower observations. J Clim 2012;25:1916e44.  UK Meteorological Office. Met office integrated data archive system (MIDAS) land surface station data (1853-current). NCAS British Atmospheric Data Centre; 2013. Available from: http://badc.nerc.ac.uk/.  Howard T, Clark P. Correction and downscaling of NWP wind speed forecasts. Meteorol Appl 2007;14:105e16.  Hasche B. General statistics of geographically dispersed wind power. Wind Energy 2010;13:773e84.  Barthelmie RJ, Pryor SC, Frandsen ST, Hansen K, Schepers JG, Rados K, et al. Quantifying the impact of wind turbine wakes on power output at offshore wind farms. J Atmos Ocean Tech 2010;27:1302e17.  Conroy N, Deane JP, Gallach�oir PPO. Wind turbine availability: should it be time or energy based? - a case study in Ireland. Renew Energy 2011;36:2967e71.  National Grid plc. Electricity ten year statement. 2013.  Department of Energy, Climate Change (DECC). Digest of UK energy statistics (DUKES). 2013. published 25th July.  Vautard R, Cattiaux J, Yiou P, Th�epaut J-N, Clais P. Northern hemisphere atmospheric stilling partly attributed to an increase in surface roughness. Nat Geosci 2010;3:756e61.  Ely C, Brayshaw DJ, Methven JM, Cox J, Pearce O. Implications of the North Atlantic oscillation for a UK-Norway renewable power system. Energy Policy November 2013;62:1420e7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.037.  Masato G, Hoskins BJ, Woolings TJ. Can the frequency of blocking be described by a red noise process? J Atmos Sci 2009;66:2143e9.  Holton JR, Hakim GJ. An introduction to dynamic meteorology. 5th ed. Elsevier Inc.; 2012.  Woolings T, Hannachi A, Hoskins B. Variability of the North Atlantic eddy driven jet stream. Q J R Meteorol Soc 2010;136:856e68.  Hawkins S, Harrison G. A reanalysis of UK wind speeds using the WRF mesoscale model. In: European Wind Energy Conference and Exhibition (EWEC); 2010.  Quest H. Energy meteorology: stormy times for UK wind power [Master's thesis]. University of Reading; 2013.  Brayshaw DJ, Dent C, Zachary S. Wind generation's contribution to supporting peak electricity demand - meteorological insights. Proc Institution Mech Eng Part O J Risk Reliab 2012;226:44e50.