A spatial view of ensemble spread in convection permitting ensembles
Dey, S. R. A., Leoncini, G., Roberts, N. M., Plant, R. S. and Migliorini, S. (2014) A spatial view of ensemble spread in convection permitting ensembles. Monthly Weather Review, 142 (11). pp. 4091-4107. ISSN 0027-0644
To link to this item DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-14-00172.1
With movement toward kilometer-scale ensembles, new techniques are needed for their characterization. A new methodology is presented for detailed spatial ensemble characterization using the fractions skill score (FSS). To evaluate spatial forecast differences, the average and standard deviation are taken of the FSS calculated over all ensemble member–member pairs at different scales and lead times. These methods were found to give important information about the ensemble behavior allowing the identification of useful spatial scales, spinup times for the model, and upscale growth of errors and forecast differences. The ensemble spread was found to be highly dependent on the spatial scales considered and the threshold applied to the field. High thresholds picked out localized and intense values that gave large temporal variability in ensemble spread: local processes and undersampling dominate for these thresholds. For lower thresholds the ensemble spread increases with time as differences between the ensemble members upscale. Two convective cases were investigated based on the Met Office United Model run at 2.2-km resolution. Different ensemble types were considered: ensembles produced using the Met Office Global and Regional Ensemble Prediction System (MOGREPS) and an ensemble produced using different model physics configurations. Comparison of the MOGREPS and multiphysics ensembles demonstrated the utility of spatial ensemble evaluation techniques for assessing the impact of different perturbation strategies and the need for assessing spread at different, believable, spatial scales.
Ancell, B. C., 2013: Nonlinear characteristics of ensemble perturbation evolution and their 661 application to forecasting high-impact events. Wea. Forecasting, 28 (6). 662 Baker, L., A. Rudd, S. Migliorini, and R. Bannister, 2014: Representation of model error in 663 a convective-scale ensemble prediction system. Nonlinear Proc. Geophys., 21 (1), 19–39. 664 Berner, J., S.-Y. Ha, J. Hacker, A. Fournier, and C. Snyder, 2011: Model uncertainty in 665 a mesoscale ensemble prediction system: Stochastic versus multiphysics representations. 666 Mon. Wea. Rev., 139 (6), 1972–1995. 667 Bowler, N. E., A. Arribas, S. E. Beare, K. R. Mylne, and G. J. Shutts, 2009: The local 668 ETKF and SKEB: Upgrades to the MOGREPS short-range ensemble prediction system. 669 Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 135 (640), 767–776. 670 Bowler, N. E., A. Arribas, K. R. Mylne, K. B. Robertson, and S. E. Beare, 2008: The MO671 GREPS short-range ensemble prediction system. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 134 (632), 672 703–722. 673 Caron, J.-F., 2013: Mismatching perturbations at the lateral boundaries in limited-area 674 ensemble forecasting: A case study. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141 (1), 356–374. 675 Clark, A. J., et al., 2011: Probabilistic precipitation forecast skill as a function of ensemble 676 size and spatial scale in a convection-allowing ensemble. Monthly Weather Review, 139 (5), 677 1410–1418. 678 Craig, G. C., C. Keil, and D. Leuenberger, 2012: Constraints on the impact of radar rain679 fall data assimilation on forecasts of cumulus convection. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 680 138 (663), 340–352. Gilleland, E., D. Ahijevych, B. G. Brown, B. Casati, and E. E. Ebert, 2009: Intercomparison 706 of spatial forecast verification methods. Wea. Forecasting, 24 (5), 1416–1430. 707 Golding, B.W., 1998: Nimrod: a system for generating automated very short range forecasts. 708 Meteorol. Appl., 5 (1), 1–16. 709 Gregory, D. and P. R. Rowntree, 1990: A mass flux convection scheme with representation of 710 cloud ensemble characteristics and stability-dependent closure. Mon. Wea. Rev., 118 (7), 711 1483–1506. 712 Hacker, J., C. Snyder, S.-Y. HA, and M. Pocernich, 2011: Linear and non-linear response to 713 parameter variations in a mesoscale model. Tellus A, 63 (3), 429–444. 714 Hanley, K., D. Kirshbaum, N. Roberts, and G. Leoncini, 2013: Sensitivities of a squall line 715 over central europe in a convective-scale ensemble. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141 (1), 112–133. 716 Hanley, K. E., D. J. Kirshbaum, S. E. Belcher, N. M. Roberts, and G. Leoncini, 2011: 717 Ensemble predictability of an isolated mountain thunderstorm in a high-resolution model. 718 Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 137 (661), 2124–2137. 719 Harrison, D. L., S. J. Driscoll, and M. Kitchen, 2000: Improving precipitation estimates from 720 weather radar using quality control and correction techniques. Meteorol. Appl., 7 (2), 135– 721 144. 722 Hohenegger, C., D. Lu¨thi, and C. Sch¨ar, 2006: Predictability mysteries in cloud-resolving 723 models. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134 (8), 2095–2107. 724 Hohenegger, C. and C. Scha¨r, 2007a: Atmospheric predictability at synoptic versus cloud725 resolving scales. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 88 (7), 1783–1793. 726 Hohenegger, C. and C. Scha¨r, 2007b: Predictability and error growth dynamics in cloud727 resolving models. J. Atmos. Sci., 64 (12), 4467–4478. Johnson, A. and X. Wang, 2013: Object-based evaluation of a storm-scale ensemble during 729 the 2009 NOAA hazardous weather testbed spring experiment. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141 (3), 730 1079–1098. 731 Johnson, A., et al., 2014: Multiscale characteristics and evolution of perturbations for warm 732 season convection-allowing precipitation forecasts: Dependence on background flow and 733 method of perturbation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 142 (3), 1053–1073. 734 Keil, C. and G. C. Craig, 2011: Regime-dependent forecast uncertainty of convective pre735 cipitation. Meteorol. Z., 20 (2), 145–151. 736 Keil, C., F. Heinlein, and G. C. Craig, 2013: The convective adjustment time-scale as 737 indicator of predictability of convective precipitation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., doi: 738 10.1002/qj.2143. 739 Ku¨hnlein, C., C. Keil, G. C. Craig, and C. Gebhardt, 2013: The impact of downscaled initial 740 condition perturbations on convective-scale ensemble forecasts of precipitation. Quart. J. 741 Roy. Meteor. Soc., doi:10.1002/qj.2238. 742 Lean, H. W., P. A. Clark, M. Dixon, N. M. Roberts, A. Fitch, R. Forbes, and C. Halli743 well, 2008: Characteristics of high-resolution versions of the Met Office Unified Model for 744 forecasting convection over the United Kingdom. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136 (9), 3408 – 3424. 745 Leoncini, G., R. S. Plant, S. L. Gray, and P. A. Clark, 2010: Perturbation growth at the 746 convective scale for CSIP IOP18. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 136 (648), 653–670. 747 Leoncini, G., R. S. Plant, S. L. Gray, and P. A. Clark, 2012: Ensemble forecasts of a flood748 producing storm: comparison of the influence of model-state perturbations and parameter 749 modifications. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 139 (670), 198–211. 750 Leoncini, G., N. Roberts, and B. Golding, 2011: 8th July 2011 Floods in Scotland. report 751 for Scottish Environment Protection Agency, Met Office, 18 pp. Lock, 752 A., A. Brown, M. Bush, G. Martin, and R. Smith, 2000: A new boundary layer 753 mixing scheme. Part I: Scheme description and single-column model tests. Mon. Wea. 754 Rev., 128 (9), 3187–3199. 755 Lorenz, E. N., 1969: The predictability of a flow which possesses many scales of motion. 756 Tellus, 21 (3), 289–307. 757 Martin, W. J. and M. Xue, 2006: Sensitivity analysis of convection of the 24 May 2002 IHOP 758 case using very large ensembles. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134 (1), 192–207. 759 Mass, C. F., D. Ovens, K. Westrick, and B. A. Colle, 2002: Does increasing horizontal 760 resolution produce more skillful forecasts? Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 83 (3), 407–430. 761 Migliorini, S., M. Dixon, R. Bannister, and S. Ballard, 2011: Ensemble prediction for now762 casting with a convection-permitting model-I : description of the system and the impact 763 of radar-derived surface precipitation rates. Tellus A, 63 (3), 468–496. 764 Mittermaier, M. and N. Roberts, 2010: Intercomparison of spatial forecast verification meth765 ods: Identifying skillful spatial scales using the fractions skill score. Wea. Forecasting, 766 25 (1), 343–354. 767 Mylne, K., 2013: Scientific framework for the ensemble prediction system for the UKV. 768 MOSAC PAPER 18.6, UK Meteorological Office. URL http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/ 769 media/pdf/q/0/MOSAC\_18.6\_Mylne.pdf. 770 Palmer, T. N., 2000: Predicting uncertainty in forecasts of weather and climate. Reports on 771 Progress in Physics, 63 (2), 71–116. 772 Rezacova, D., P. Zacharov, and Z. Sokol, 2009: Uncertainty in the area-related QPF for 773 heavy convective precipitation. Atmos. Res., 93 (1), 238–246. 774 Roberts, N., 2008: Assessing the spatial and temporal variation in the skill of precipitation 775 forecasts from an NWP model. Meteorol. Appl., 15 (1), 163–169. Roberts, 776 N. M., 2003: The impact of a change to the use of the convection scheme 777 to high resolution simulations of convective events. Forecasting Research Techni778 cal Report 407, Met Office, 30 pp. URL http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/archive/ 779 forecasting-research-technical-report-407, available from the National Meteoro780 logical Libray and Archive. 781 Roberts, N. M. and H. W. Lean, 2008: Scale-selective verification of rainfall accumulations 782 from high-resolution forecasts of convective events. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136 (1), 78–97. 783 Schwartz, C. S., et al., 2010: Toward improved convection-allowing ensembles: Model physics 784 sensitivities and optimizing probabilistic guidance with small ensemble membership. Wea. 785 Forecasting, 25 (1), 263–280. 786 Stensrud, D. J., J.-W. Bao, and T. T. Warner, 2000: Using initial condition and model 787 physics perturbations in short-range ensemble simulations of mesoscale convective systems. 788 Mon. Wea. Rev., 128 (7), 2077–2107. 789 Surcel, M., I. Zawadzki, and M. K. Yau, 2014: On the filtering properties of ensemble 790 averaging for storm-scale precipitation forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 142 (3), 1093–1105. 791 Vi´e, B., G. Molini´e, O. Nuissier, B. Vincendon, V. Ducrocq, F. Bouttier, and E. Richard, 792 2012: Hydro-meteorological evaluation of a convection-permitting ensemble prediction 793 system for mediterranean heavy precipitating events. Nat. Hazards Earth Sys., 12 (8), 794 2631–2645. 795 Walser, A., D. Lu¨thi, and C. Scha¨r, 2004: Predictability of precipitation in a cloud-resolving 796 model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132 (2), 560–577. 797 Walser, A. and C. Scha¨r, 2004: Convection-resolving precipitation forecasting and its pre798 dictability in alpine river catchments. J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam, Neth.), 288 (12), 57 – 799 73. Wilkinson, J., 2011: The large-scale precipitation parametrization scheme. Unified Model 801 Documentation Paper 26, Unified Model Version: 8.0, Met Office, 53 pp. 802 Wilson, D. R. and S. P. Ballard, 1999: A microphysically based precipitation scheme for 803 the UK Meteorological Office Unified Model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 125 (557), 804 1607–1636. 805 Zacharov, P. and D. Rezacova, 2009: Using the fractions skill score to assess the relationship 806 between an ensemble QPF spread and skill. Atmos. Res., 94 (4), 684–693. 807 Zhang, F., 2005: Dynamics and structure of mesoscale error covariance of a winter cyclone 808 estimated through short-range ensemble forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133 (10), 2876–2893. 809 Zimmer, M., G. C. Craig, C. Keil, and H. Wernli, 2011: Classification of precipitation events 810 with a convective response timescale and their forecasting characteristics. Geophys. Res. 811 Lett., 38, doi:10.1029/2010GL046199.