Accessibility navigation


Nonword repetition performance of Arabic-speaking children with and without Developmental Language Disorder: a study on diagnostic accuracy

Taha, J., Stojanovik, V. and Pagnamenta, E. (2021) Nonword repetition performance of Arabic-speaking children with and without Developmental Language Disorder: a study on diagnostic accuracy. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research. ISSN 1558-9102 (In Press)

[img] Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.

15MB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Abstract/Summary

Purpose: This study evaluates the effectiveness of a nonword repetition (NWR) task in discriminating between Palestinian Arabic-speaking children with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) and age-matched typically-developing (TD) children. Methods: Participants were 30 children with DLD aged between 4;00 and 6;10 and 60 TD children aged between 4;00 and 6;8 matched on chronological age. The Arabic version of a Quasi-Universal Nonword Repetition task was administered. The task comprises 30 nonwords that vary in length, presence of consonant clusters (CC) and wordlikeness ratings. Responses were scored using an item-level scoring method. To assess the diagnostic accuracy of the task. ROC curve analysis was conducted to determine the best cut-off point with the highest sensitivity and specificity values and likelihood ratios were calculated. Results: Children with DLD scored significantly lower on the NWR task than their age� matched TD peers. Only the DLD group was influenced by the phonological complexity of the nonwords, with nonwords with two CC being more difficult than nonwords with no or only one CC. For both groups, three-syllable nonwords were repeated less accurately than two and one-syllable nonwords. Also, high word-like nonwords were repeated more accurately than nonwords with low wordlikeness ratings. The best cutoff score had sensitivity and specificity of 93% and highly informative likelihood ratios. Conclusion: NWR was an area of difficulty for Palestinian Arabic-speaking children with DLD. NWR showed excellent discriminatory power in differentiating Arabic-speaking children diagnosed with DLD from their age-matched TD peers. NWR appears to hold promise for clinical use as it is a useful indicator of DLD in Arabic. These results need to be further validated using population-based studies.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Clinical Language Sciences
ID Code:97007
Publisher:ASHA

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation