Accessibility navigation


Exploring the vulnerability of practice-like activities: an ethnographic perspective

Bolade-Ogunfodun, Y. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8143-6946, Sinnicks, M., Akrivou, K. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2212-6280 and Scalzo, G. (2022) Exploring the vulnerability of practice-like activities: an ethnographic perspective. Frontiers in Sociology, 7. 100374. ISSN 2297-7775

[img]
Preview
Text (Open access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.

303kB
[img] Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only

509kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.1003741

Abstract/Summary

This paper offers an ethnographic case study of a UK-based engineering company in the aftermath of its acquisition, focusing in particular on its R&D unit. The Lab struggled to maintain its practice-based work in an institutional environment that emphasised the pursuit of external goods. We use this case to develop two arguments. Firstly, we illustrate the concept of ‘practice-like’ activities and explore their vulnerability to institutional domination. Secondly, in light of the style of management on display after the takeover, we offer further support to MacIntyre’s critique of management. Finally, based on the empirical data we reflect on the importance of organisational culture, as well as friendship and the achievement of a common good in business organisations for these kinds of activities.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Henley Business School > Leadership, Organisations and Behaviour
ID Code:109043
Publisher:Frontiers

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation